2008
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0b013e3181743980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Viral Suppression on Cross-Sectional Incidence Testing in the Johns Hopkins Hospital Emergency Department

Abstract: : By removing the viral load-negative individuals and confirming the initial Vironostika-LS EIA results by avidity testing, the incidence estimate was lowered from 1.73% to 0.94% per year in 2001 and from 1.90% to 0.56% per year in 2003. Viral suppression affects the performance of the cross-sectional incidence tests, which rely on antibody titer. In addition, 2% (10 of 426) of all HIV-infected individuals who use the JHH ED for medical care seem to suppress HIV to undetectable levels without ARVs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
69
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding could be due to the observation of significantly higher EndoCAb levels in the African subjects before seroconversion, most likely related to differences in sanitation between the U.S. and African environments, and the endemic parasitic and bacterial disease load in the African population. It also is possible that genetic differences between the 2 uninfected populations affected the differences observed; however, the U.S. comparison group was predominantly African-American, which should limit this effect (23). EndoCAb levels in the African subjects remained consistently high throughout infection regardless of progression status, which may explain in part why circulating LPS levels did not increase in the African subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This finding could be due to the observation of significantly higher EndoCAb levels in the African subjects before seroconversion, most likely related to differences in sanitation between the U.S. and African environments, and the endemic parasitic and bacterial disease load in the African population. It also is possible that genetic differences between the 2 uninfected populations affected the differences observed; however, the U.S. comparison group was predominantly African-American, which should limit this effect (23). EndoCAb levels in the African subjects remained consistently high throughout infection regardless of progression status, which may explain in part why circulating LPS levels did not increase in the African subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, our previous studies have shown a high rate of false-recent misclassification among HIV-infected elite suppressors who have low or undetectable viral loads in the absence of ARV use. 23 In this study, ARV use was not associated with falserecent misclassification in multivariate models that also included HIV viral load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Serologic incidence assays have also been used as components of multiassay algorithms (MAAs) developed for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation (3). Some MAAs also include nonserologic biomarkers, such as CD4 cell count, viral load, and antiretroviral testing or self-report, to help identify individuals with long-standing HIV infections (2,4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%