2017
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of visual feedback of body parts on pain perception: A systematic review of clinical and experimental studies

Abstract: It was not possible to determine whether normal-sized, magnified or minified visual feedback of body parts affected pain perception in clinical or experimental settings because of contradictory findings in primary studies. This emphasizes the need for higher quality studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulties of blinding participants and outcome assessors when using VR interventions have been discussed previously. [26] Blinding of participants and outcome assessor is extremely important, as it is known that lack of blinding is associated with a risk of biasing outcomes especially in studies with more subjective outcomes, such as pain perception. [13,27,28] From the 13 included studies, only two presented sample size calculations, which is critical in determining the number of participants necessary to provide sufficiently high power to detect clinically meaningful treatment effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difficulties of blinding participants and outcome assessors when using VR interventions have been discussed previously. [26] Blinding of participants and outcome assessor is extremely important, as it is known that lack of blinding is associated with a risk of biasing outcomes especially in studies with more subjective outcomes, such as pain perception. [13,27,28] From the 13 included studies, only two presented sample size calculations, which is critical in determining the number of participants necessary to provide sufficiently high power to detect clinically meaningful treatment effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms of action of mirror visual feedback are not fully elucidated but it is hypothesized that the view of a healthyfunctional limb will promote sensory-motor congruence and correct disrupted mental representations of body parts by reducing dysfunctional cortical reorganization [35,36,37,38]. Recent systematic reviews with meta-analyses indicate that mirror visual feedback is effective to reduce pain [26,39]. Our findings indicate that virtual representation of body parts may be effective in the treatment of neuropathic and phantom limb pain; however, conclusive evidence can only be achieved by conducting randomized controlled trials where the effect of virtual representation of body parts can be compared with a suitable control intervention.Frequency and time of exposure seem to be an important aspect of VR interventions especially when used to manage chronic pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La TRV forma parte de los MRM cuando el foco del tratamiento se centra en función sensoriomotora. Sin embargo, hay que tomar en cuenta que existe otro enfoque de tratamiento que presenta una orientación sensitivo-visual, en el que el foco se dirige a la visualización de estímulos somatosensoriales sobre una región corporal concreta (que no tiene por qué estar en movimiento) para modular la percepción dolorosa (Wittkopf et al, 2018;Heinrich et al, 2019). A este modelo de tratamiento se le denomina terapia de retroalimentación sensitivo-visual (TRV-SV) y, a pesar de que este tratamiento tiene gran interés clínico no se puede considerar un MRM.…”
Section: Terapia De Retroalimentación Visualunclassified
“…Mirrors, lenses, and virtual reality have been used to alleviate pain and improve function through visual distraction, ‘normalizing’ the appearance of dysmorphic painful body parts, reducing threat associated with moving painful body parts, and aligning ownership and agency of body parts through visual, proprioceptive, and tactile congruency. Therapeutic success is varied and research findings from systematic reviews of controlled clinical studies are inconsistent due to a paucity of robust primary studies [94,95,96,97].…”
Section: Pain Perception: Active Top-down Processing?mentioning
confidence: 99%