2016
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1174-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of visualization on visual search performance

Abstract: Striking results recently demonstrated that visualizing search for a target can facilitate visual search for that target on subsequent trials (Reinhart et al., 2015). This visualization benefit was even greater than the benefit of actually repeating search for the target. We registered a close replication and generalization of the original experiment. Our results show clear benefits of repeatedly searching for the same target, but we found no benefit associated with visualization. The difficulty of the search … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several parallel results between visual imagery and visual perception have been reported recently. These imagery effects have been demonstrated in visual search (Cochrane, Nwabuike, Thomson, & Milliken, 2018; Cochrane, Zhu, & Milliken, 2018; Reinhart, McClenahan, & Woodman, 2015; though see Clarke, Barr, & Hunt, 2016), binocular rivalry (Chang, Lewis, & Pearson, 2013; Pearson, Clifford, & Tong, 2008; Pearson, Rademaker, & Tong, 2011) and object identification (Wantz, Borst, Mast, & Lobmaier, 2015; though see Cochrane, Siddhpuria, & Milliken, 2019).…”
Section: Using Visual Imagery To Study Repetition Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several parallel results between visual imagery and visual perception have been reported recently. These imagery effects have been demonstrated in visual search (Cochrane, Nwabuike, Thomson, & Milliken, 2018; Cochrane, Zhu, & Milliken, 2018; Reinhart, McClenahan, & Woodman, 2015; though see Clarke, Barr, & Hunt, 2016), binocular rivalry (Chang, Lewis, & Pearson, 2013; Pearson, Clifford, & Tong, 2008; Pearson, Rademaker, & Tong, 2011) and object identification (Wantz, Borst, Mast, & Lobmaier, 2015; though see Cochrane, Siddhpuria, & Milliken, 2019).…”
Section: Using Visual Imagery To Study Repetition Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When the distractors were not presented, participants did not need to imagine any stimuli except for a target, which led to a precise mental representation of a target in the perceptual training. Removing a salient distractor item in the search task also eliminated the search efficiency of imagery training (Clarke, Barr, & Hunt, 2016). Taken together, precise mental imagery of a target stimulus enhances attentional allocation to the target in a visual-search task.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Second, there is little supporting evidence for the link between visualization and improved attention; importantly, some of the literature aiming to reinforce the findings of article 4 contradicts it. For instance, the preregistered failed replication and extension of article 4's experiments conducted by Clarke, Barr and Hunt (2016) showed repeated searching -not visualization -improved attention. Other factors to consider are generalization and feasibility.…”
Section: Qualitative Target Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%