2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.664940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Clinical Outcomes for Critically Ill Patients: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Abstract: Purpose: Vitamin D deficiency is a common scenario in critically ill patients and has been proven to be associated with poor outcomes. However, the effect of vitamin D supplementation for critically ill patients remains controversial. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation among critically ill patients.Methods: Electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials between 2000 and January 202… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 4–7 Similarly, the rate of morbidity and mortality was considerably high in COVID positive patients having vitamin D deficiency as compared to patients with normal levels of vitamin D. 8–11 However, RCTs showing improvement in the mortality rate with vitamin D supplementation remains non-significant, majorly due to smaller sample size and lower incidence of mortality in the study participants. 12 In contrast, there was another study that documented a positive impact on mortality with vitamin D supplementation. 13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4–7 Similarly, the rate of morbidity and mortality was considerably high in COVID positive patients having vitamin D deficiency as compared to patients with normal levels of vitamin D. 8–11 However, RCTs showing improvement in the mortality rate with vitamin D supplementation remains non-significant, majorly due to smaller sample size and lower incidence of mortality in the study participants. 12 In contrast, there was another study that documented a positive impact on mortality with vitamin D supplementation. 13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, vitamin D deficiency could increase the risk of sepsis and inflammation in severely ill patients by diminishing the immune response and modulatory effects on innate immunity. [67][68][69][70][71][72] The strength of this study lies in the fact that it is the first study to analyze the ISARIC-4C Score in COVID-19 patients with deficient vitamin D. The majority of this study's data were collected during the Omicron variation's development and can be utilized to make comparisons to the Delta variant or any other variants. However, this study has several limitations that should be considered to improve the further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, vitamin D deficiency could increase the risk of sepsis and inflammation in severely ill patients by diminishing the immune response and modulatory effects on innate immunity. [78][79][80][81][82][83] Furthermore, several COVID-19 pandemic studies contained some substantial biases and were not representative of the real-world conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. 84,85 In regions where authorities implemented home isolation and social distancing measures, individuals with mild to moderate cases of COVID-19 were generally not hospitalized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%