2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of zotepine, risperidone, clozapine and olanzapine on MK-801-disrupted sensorimotor gating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
46
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
11
46
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, modulation of dopaminergic activity is unlikely to be directly responsible for the disruptive effect of MK-801 on PPI, as MK-801 also disrupted PPI in wild-type and mutant D 1 and D 2 receptor knockout mice (Ralph-Williams et al, 2002), and typical antipsychotics with dopamine antagonist profiles do not restore MK-801-induced deficits in sensorimotor gating (Curzon and Decker, 1998;Martin et al, 2003). In the present study, the observation that the atypical antipsychotic clozapine restores MK-801-induced PPI disruption is in agreement with previous studies in rats and mice (Bakshi et al, 1994;Martin et al, 2003;Bubenikova et al, 2005) and provides a positive control for reversal of MK-801-induced sensorimotor gating deficits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, modulation of dopaminergic activity is unlikely to be directly responsible for the disruptive effect of MK-801 on PPI, as MK-801 also disrupted PPI in wild-type and mutant D 1 and D 2 receptor knockout mice (Ralph-Williams et al, 2002), and typical antipsychotics with dopamine antagonist profiles do not restore MK-801-induced deficits in sensorimotor gating (Curzon and Decker, 1998;Martin et al, 2003). In the present study, the observation that the atypical antipsychotic clozapine restores MK-801-induced PPI disruption is in agreement with previous studies in rats and mice (Bakshi et al, 1994;Martin et al, 2003;Bubenikova et al, 2005) and provides a positive control for reversal of MK-801-induced sensorimotor gating deficits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In contrast, olanzapine (but not risperidone or haloperidol) is highly effective at reversing NMDA antagonist-induced PPI deficits, mostly in rodent models (Bakshi & Geyer, 1995;Duncan et al, 2000;Geyer et al, 2001). In general, rodent model studies show that NMDA antagonist-induced PPI deficits are selectively reversed by second-vs. first-generation antipsychotic medications (Bubenikova et al, 2005;Geyer & Ellenbroek, 2003;Geyer et al, 2001). The results from the current study are consistent with this animal literature in NMDA models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, given that the great majority of people with schizophrenia use tobacco, the necessity of nicotine as a co-treatment for this clinical effect remains unclear. In rats, it has been shown that clozapine by itself is effective in attenuating unimodal auditory PPI impairments due to NMDA glutamate blockade (Andreasen et al 2006;Ballmaier et al 2001;Bubenikova et al 2005;Geyer et al 2001;Linn et al 2003;Lipina et al 2005;Swerdlow et al 1996), although there are some contrary results that clozapine by itself does not significantly attenuate unimodal auditory PPI impairments caused by dizocilpine (Bast et al 2000;Hoffman et al 1993;Levin et al 2005). Bast et al showed that dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg) impaired unimodal acoustic PPI and that this effect was not reversed by clozapine at a dose of 5 mg/kg (Bast et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been related to abnormalities in sensory gating in general. A variety of studies with experimental animals show that clozapine reverses PPI-disruptive effects of NMDA antagonists in models of schizophrenia (Andreasen et al 2006;Ballmaier et al 2001;Bubenikova et al 2005;Linn et al 2003;Lipina et al 2005;Swerdlow et al 1996), However, there is little research determining the generality or specificity of sensory gating across modalities. Differential pharmacological effects in unimodal auditory PPI vs. crossmodal auditory-tactile PPI would indicate the involvement of differential neural systems in bases of these different measures of sensorimotor plasticity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%