The effect on coronal leakage of liquid adhesive application over root fillings after smear layer removal with EDTA or Er:YAG laser

Souza, Fabrício Dias de; Pécora, Jesus Djalma; Silva, Ricardo Gariba

doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.066

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, their efficacy to permeate the smear layer and to impregnate the dentin remains a major concern (5, 6). Radicular dentin surfaces were always covered with a thick smear layer and debris after mechanical preparation (7), which might prevent effective resin bonding (8)(9)(10). It is difficult to remove the smear layer in the root canal with regular water irrigation because of the narrow and deep circumstance of post space, especially in its apical area.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Different Irrigation on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation

Xiao

Mao

Kern

2009

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Different Irrigation on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation

Xiao

Mao

Kern

2009

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…RNA can be hydrolyzed by ribonucleases, which require divalent cations, preferably magnesium (37Y39). Decalcification with EDTA is achieved by chelating the calcium ions from the samples (40,41). Perhaps the RNA preservation was decreased as compared with decalcification with Morse's solution because EDTA must chelate 2 ions simultaneously, calcium and magnesium.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

RNA Preservation in Decalcified Cochlear Samples

Waissbluth¹,

Chan²,

Chen³

et al. 2013

Otology &Amp; Neurotology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One promising approach to prevent microleakage in endodontic treatment may be the application of dentin adhesive materials, which can seal and protect root canal walls (16,17). Here, five commercially available AS were evaluated to test E. faecalis biofilm formation on their surface.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In vitro enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on five adhesive systems

Baca¹,

Freitas²,

Ferrer-Luque³

et al. 2012

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To determine the E. faecalis biofilm formation on the surface of five adhesive systems (AS) and its relationship with roughness. Study Design: The formation of E. faecalis biofilms was tested on the surface of four dual-cure AS: AdheSE DC, Clearfil DC Bond, Futurabond DC and Excite DSC and one light-cure antimicrobial AS, Clearfil Protect Bond, after 24 hours of incubation, using the MBEC high-throughput device. Results: E. faecalis biofilms grew on all the adhesives. The least growth of biofilm was on Excite DSC, Clearfil Protect Bond, and the control. Futurabond DC resulted in the greatest roughness and biofilm amount. There was a close relationship between the quantity of biofilm and roughness, except for Clearfil Protect Bond, which showed little biofilm but high roughness. Conclusion: None of the tested AS prevented E. faecalis biofilm formation, although the least quantity was found on the surface of Clearfil Protect Bond. Key words:Adhesive systems, biofilm, Enterococcus faecalis, roughness.

show abstract

The effect on coronal leakage of liquid adhesive application over root fillings after smear layer removal with EDTA or Er:YAG laser

Cited by 9 publications

References 23 publications

Effect of Different Irrigation on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation

Effect of Different Irrigation on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation

RNA Preservation in Decalcified Cochlear Samples

In vitro enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on five adhesive systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About