2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2015.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effective interface approach for coupling of the FE and meshless FD methods and applying essential boundary conditions

Abstract: Available online xxxx Keywords:Meshless finite difference method Finite element method Coupling method a b s t r a c t The paper presents a new effective technique for coupling two computational methods with different types of discretization and approximation. It is based on a concept of two adjacent subdomains which are connected with each other by means of a thin layer of material. Each of the subdomain may have a different discretization structure and approximation base. The standard Finite Element Method (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a manner, resulting approximation coefficients have simple interpretation as local derivatives, up to the assumed pth order. Fundamentals and general remarks concerning the MWLS technique may be found in [18,25,31], whereas details of its application for the second-order differential equations are given in [45,46,48]. Comparison of MWLS (with singular weight functions) and MLS (with non-singular weight functions) techniques with other meshless approximation methods may be found in [29,31,33,35].…”
Section: Determination Of Direction Selection Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a manner, resulting approximation coefficients have simple interpretation as local derivatives, up to the assumed pth order. Fundamentals and general remarks concerning the MWLS technique may be found in [18,25,31], whereas details of its application for the second-order differential equations are given in [45,46,48]. Comparison of MWLS (with singular weight functions) and MLS (with non-singular weight functions) techniques with other meshless approximation methods may be found in [29,31,33,35].…”
Section: Determination Of Direction Selection Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, a number of studies have been performed to develop coupled methods of FEM and meshless methods. A majority of existing studies focused on coupling of FEM and weak-form meshless methods such as elementfree Galerkin (EFG) method [16][17][18], meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method [19,20], and meshless finite difference method [21,22]. Most of these studies [16,17,19,20] constructed interface elements and established special approximation functions in these elements to achieve a continuous transition between FEM and meshless regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the previous three main groups of methods, some other procedures have been proposed. For example, Jagkowiec and Milewski laid off a thin layer of material along the essential boundary or the material interface and utilized finite difference to approximate partial derivatives of the field variables in the thin layer, leading to an asymmetric coefficient matrix. By direct splitting the meshfree function space, Schweitzer implemented a conforming local treatment of essential boundary data, where the PU functions must be flat‐top.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%