2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to conventional pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a favorable safety profile, decreased risk of major bleeding, and no need for routine drug monitoring or dietary regulation, DOAC use has increased dramatically at the expense of VKAs since their introduction to clinical practice in 2010 ( 24 , 25 ). DOACs have also shown comparable outcomes to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in the setting of hip fractures ( 26 ). In 2015, DOACs accounted for 56.5% of all oral anticoagulant prescriptions and are now the anticoagulant of choice for many patients with atrial fibrillation or a history of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) ( 27 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a favorable safety profile, decreased risk of major bleeding, and no need for routine drug monitoring or dietary regulation, DOAC use has increased dramatically at the expense of VKAs since their introduction to clinical practice in 2010 ( 24 , 25 ). DOACs have also shown comparable outcomes to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in the setting of hip fractures ( 26 ). In 2015, DOACs accounted for 56.5% of all oral anticoagulant prescriptions and are now the anticoagulant of choice for many patients with atrial fibrillation or a history of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) ( 27 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%