2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of access and benefit sharing in Costa Rica: implications for national and international regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notable exceptions are Mexico and Costa Rica, where CBD goals and objectives have been incorporated into cross-cutting sectoral policies as well as monitoring efforts (Aguilar-Stroen and Dhillion 2003). Challenges still remain with respect to determining the level of protection awarded to biodiversity in the region (including Mexico and Costa Rica) and extent of benefit sharing (Aguilar-Stroen and Dhillion 2003;Richerzhagen and Holm-Mueller 2005;DeOliveira 2008). Despite these significant challenges, theories on social or institutional learning suggest that CBD has great potential in future implementation once CBD goals are effectively integrated into policies and executed through decentralized, development-oriented agencies (Seibenhuner and Suplie 2005;DeOliveira 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Notable exceptions are Mexico and Costa Rica, where CBD goals and objectives have been incorporated into cross-cutting sectoral policies as well as monitoring efforts (Aguilar-Stroen and Dhillion 2003). Challenges still remain with respect to determining the level of protection awarded to biodiversity in the region (including Mexico and Costa Rica) and extent of benefit sharing (Aguilar-Stroen and Dhillion 2003;Richerzhagen and Holm-Mueller 2005;DeOliveira 2008). Despite these significant challenges, theories on social or institutional learning suggest that CBD has great potential in future implementation once CBD goals are effectively integrated into policies and executed through decentralized, development-oriented agencies (Seibenhuner and Suplie 2005;DeOliveira 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other examples for ABS have shown that this often takes the form of direct payments for the bioprospecting of new products (e.g. Richerzhagen & Holm-Mueller 2005). However, applying the principles of ABS to the orchid trade will require a different approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst this may be a useful model for the mass-market horticultural industry, it is unlikely to work for the orchid species market, which is supplied by small businesses selling a large range of species in small numbers. Additionally, direct payments would only be successful for newly commercialized species, as sharing benefits is particularly difficult if captive breeding or propagation has already been taking place for some time in different countries (Roe et al 2002; Richerzhagen & Holm-Mueller 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, there is a lack of evidence to support the assumption that benefit-sharing leads to effective conservation of biodiversity (Suneetha and Pisupati, 2009;Pisupati and Bavikatte, 2014). In addition, the burden on the users (such as universities and private companies) and regulatory authorities in terms of administrative complexity when complying with ABS legislation and conducting benefit-sharing can act as a disincentive for utilisation of genetic resources, potentially limiting the benefits derived and shared (Richerzhagen and Holm-Mueller, 2005;Tvedt, 2013). Further challenges exist with regards to achieving fair and equitable benefit-sharing and sustainable development (Louafi, 2013;Tsioumani, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%