Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
ObjectivesThis study aims to evaluate (1) the effect and safety of acupuncture in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and explore (2) whether the effect of acupuncture differed according to acupuncture type, acupuncture dose and follow-up time.DesignSystematic review and pairwise and exploratory network meta-analysis.SettingPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals and Wanfang from inception to 13 November 2023.ParticipantsRandomised controlled trials comparing acupuncture with sham acupuncture, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), usual care or waiting list groups, intra-articular (IA) injection and blank groups in patients with KOA.InterventionsEligible interventions included manual acupuncture (MA) and electroacupuncture (EA).Main outcomes measuresThe primary outcome was pain intensity at the end of treatment.Results80 trials (9933 participants) were included. Very low certainty evidence suggested that acupuncture may reduce pain intensity compared with sham acupuncture (standardised mean difference, SMD −0.74, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.39, corresponded to a difference in Visual Analogue Scale of −18.50 mm, −27.00 to −9.75), NSAIDs (SMD −0.86 to –1.26 to −0.46, corresponded to −21.50 mm, −31.50 to −11.50), usual care or waiting list groups (SMD −1.01, –1.47 to −0.54, corresponded to −25.25 mm, −36.75 to −13.50) and blank groups (SMD −1.65, –1.99 to −1.32, corresponded to −41.25 mm, −49.75 to −33.00), but not IA injection. Similar results were also found in other outcomes. For most of the subgroup analyses, acupuncture type, acupuncture dose and follow-up time did not show a significant relative effect. Only when compared with NSAIDs, a higher dose of acupuncture may provide greater pain relief (interaction p<0.001). The network meta-analysis revealed that electroacupuncture (SMD −0.75, 95% CI −1.34 to −0.17) had a greater effect on pain relief in patients with KOA compared with manual acupuncture.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that acupuncture may provide clinically important effects in reducing pain and improving physical function in patients with KOA, but the certainty of evidence was very low. Electroacupuncture and higher dose of acupuncture probably are two potential contributing factors.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021232177.
ObjectivesThis study aims to evaluate (1) the effect and safety of acupuncture in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and explore (2) whether the effect of acupuncture differed according to acupuncture type, acupuncture dose and follow-up time.DesignSystematic review and pairwise and exploratory network meta-analysis.SettingPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals and Wanfang from inception to 13 November 2023.ParticipantsRandomised controlled trials comparing acupuncture with sham acupuncture, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), usual care or waiting list groups, intra-articular (IA) injection and blank groups in patients with KOA.InterventionsEligible interventions included manual acupuncture (MA) and electroacupuncture (EA).Main outcomes measuresThe primary outcome was pain intensity at the end of treatment.Results80 trials (9933 participants) were included. Very low certainty evidence suggested that acupuncture may reduce pain intensity compared with sham acupuncture (standardised mean difference, SMD −0.74, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.39, corresponded to a difference in Visual Analogue Scale of −18.50 mm, −27.00 to −9.75), NSAIDs (SMD −0.86 to –1.26 to −0.46, corresponded to −21.50 mm, −31.50 to −11.50), usual care or waiting list groups (SMD −1.01, –1.47 to −0.54, corresponded to −25.25 mm, −36.75 to −13.50) and blank groups (SMD −1.65, –1.99 to −1.32, corresponded to −41.25 mm, −49.75 to −33.00), but not IA injection. Similar results were also found in other outcomes. For most of the subgroup analyses, acupuncture type, acupuncture dose and follow-up time did not show a significant relative effect. Only when compared with NSAIDs, a higher dose of acupuncture may provide greater pain relief (interaction p<0.001). The network meta-analysis revealed that electroacupuncture (SMD −0.75, 95% CI −1.34 to −0.17) had a greater effect on pain relief in patients with KOA compared with manual acupuncture.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that acupuncture may provide clinically important effects in reducing pain and improving physical function in patients with KOA, but the certainty of evidence was very low. Electroacupuncture and higher dose of acupuncture probably are two potential contributing factors.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021232177.
Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the procedure of choice for osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK) when conservative treatment fails; however, high rates of dissatisfaction and poor implant longevity dissuade younger patients from TKA. There is a paucity of evidence that report outcomes and clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic knee procedures in patients with end-stage (grade 3-4) OAK. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe (grade 3-4) OAK. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed with the terms “Knee,” “Osteoarthritis,” and/or “Arthroscopic debridement,” “Arthroscopic lavage,” “Arthroscopic microfracture,” “Arthroscopic chondroplasty,” “debridement,” “lavage,” “chondroplasty,” “microfracture,” and/or “arthroscopy” in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases in November 2023 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Databases were searched for studies that evaluated outcomes (e.g., pain, function, and conversion to TKA) for patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 to 4 OAK after knee arthroscopy (including debridement, lavage, microfracture, or chondroplasty) at a minimum 6-month follow-up. Percent improvement from preoperative score was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included achievement of minimal clinically importance difference and conversion to TKA. Results: Nine studies (410 knees with grades 3-4 OAK) were included. Arthroscopic debridement and lavage resulted in a 18.8% to 53.1% improvement at short-term follow-up (e.g., 6 months to 3 years) and a 50.0% improvement at long-term follow-up (e.g., 10 years) in knees with grade 3 OAK and a 15.0% to 41.3% improvement at short-term follow-up and a 46.9% improvement at long-term follow-up in knees with grade 4 OAK. Arthroscopic debridement and microfracture resulted in 1.6% to 50.8% improvement at short-term follow-up in knees with grade 3 OAK. No studies included long-term outcomes or evaluated knees with grade 4 OAK after arthroscopic debridement and microfracture. Conversion to TKA after arthroscopic debridement and lavage occurred in 21.9% of patients with grade 3 OAK and in 35.0% of patients with grade 4 OAK at short-term follow-up and in 47.4% of patients with grade 3 OAK and in 76.5% of patients with grade 4 OAK at long-term follow-up. Conversion to TKA after arthroscopic debridement and microfracture occurred in 10.9% of patients with grade 3 and 4 OAK at long-term follow-up. Conclusion: Arthroscopic debridement, lavage, and microfracture can provide short- and long-term symptomatic relief and improvement in function by up to 50.0% in patients with grade 3 to 4 OAK. These procedures may result in fewer patients with grade 3 OAK undergoing TKA compared with patients with grade 4 OAK. Level of Evidence: Level IV; systematic review of Level II-IV studies. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.