2014
DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2014-1746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of cleansing solutions for wound treatment: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The full version of this systematic review report was published in JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports (Queirós et al, 2014).…”
Section: Systematic Review Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full version of this systematic review report was published in JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports (Queirós et al, 2014).…”
Section: Systematic Review Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terdapat berbagai solusi yang tersedia untuk pencucian luka yaitu normal salin, povidone-iodine, hydrogen peroxide, cairan pencuci luka komersial, chlorine/sodium hypochlorite, revanol, alkohol 70%, Clorheksidin, air dan sabun antiseptik (Wilkins & Unverdorben, 2013 ;Arisanty, (2013). Penelitian menurut Queirós et al, (2014) menyatakan bahwa pencucian luka dengan menggunakan povidone-iodine, hydrogen peroksida dan natrium hipoklorit tidak dianjurkan karena bersifat korosif terhadap jaringan granulasi sehingga dapat mengganggu proses penyembuhan luka.…”
Section: Diskusiunclassified
“…The Champions for Skin Integrity (CSI) model of evidence‐based wound care was developed in 2009, consisting of a multi‐strategy model to facilitate the uptake of evidence‐based wound assessment, management and prevention strategies (Edwards, Finlayson, Parker, Jensen, & Finlayson, ). This model has previously been described in Edwards et al (), and results from a previous study of the CSI model demonstrated the value and capacity of a multi‐faceted approach (Edwards et al, ) to the transfer of knowledge through three areas: 1 day educational “train‐the‐trainer” workshops; human resource support through supporting and facilitating internal and external network development; and practical tools in the form of a CSI resource kit developed from evidence‐based guidelines, such as those produced by the Royal College of Nursing (RCN Institute Centre for Evidence Based Nursing, ), Joanna Briggs Institute (Queirós et al, ) and Wounds Australia (formerly Australian Wound Management Association) (The Australian Wound Management Association Inc & the New Zealand Wound Care Society Inc, ). The CSI model has been successfully implemented in the area of Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs) in Australia, resulting in a decreased prevalence of wounds and an increase in staff confidence and uptake of evidence‐based wound management strategies (Edwards et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%