2019
DOI: 10.1177/1747954119829918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of constraint-led training on skill development in interceptive sports: A systematic review (Clark, McEwan and Christie) – A Commentary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 For example, a practitioner may overconstrain players, 34 encourage excessive time in isolated activity rather than appropriate contextualisation, 35,36 utilise both implicit and explicit methods in combination thereby neutralising the effect of the implicit learning technique, 26 or adopt a 'the game is the teacher' mentality where appropriate coaching is prohibited. 37,38 To be clear, we are not opposed to efforts at integration; rather, we wish to emphasise that without due care, abstracting parts of different pedagogies can result in fragmented and mutated 'folk pedagogies' 39 : incoherent assumptions about learning and coaching which can be difficult for coach development to overcome. [40][41][42] Lindsay and Spittle offer their set of guiding principles to integrate the theoretical approaches; that is, to combine and/ or move between coaching strategies associated with the different theoretical approaches as the circumstances demand.…”
Section: Risks Associated With the Integration Of Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 For example, a practitioner may overconstrain players, 34 encourage excessive time in isolated activity rather than appropriate contextualisation, 35,36 utilise both implicit and explicit methods in combination thereby neutralising the effect of the implicit learning technique, 26 or adopt a 'the game is the teacher' mentality where appropriate coaching is prohibited. 37,38 To be clear, we are not opposed to efforts at integration; rather, we wish to emphasise that without due care, abstracting parts of different pedagogies can result in fragmented and mutated 'folk pedagogies' 39 : incoherent assumptions about learning and coaching which can be difficult for coach development to overcome. [40][41][42] Lindsay and Spittle offer their set of guiding principles to integrate the theoretical approaches; that is, to combine and/ or move between coaching strategies associated with the different theoretical approaches as the circumstances demand.…”
Section: Risks Associated With the Integration Of Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further opportunities exist to develop these technologies with knowledge from other disciplines such as agriculture, city planning and the military (Table 1 ). However, as observations are embedded in context, the measurement and collection of reliable constraint data is required to take place without losing the validity required for scientific rigour and thereby aid in promoting experimental representative design [ 107 ].…”
Section: Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One criticism leveraged at ecological dynamics points towards its complexity, with research to date being largely conceptual or performed in a laboratory [ 114 ]. The measurement of constraints in practice has often been reductionist in approach [ 107 ], emphasising either one or two constraints that are measured in isolation [ 32 ]. This can provide rigour in relation to the methodological approach; however, it is less representative of the environment being explored [ 107 ].…”
Section: Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also a demand for better knowledge translation to the coaches influencing skill development as practice recommendations are currently hidden in complex pedagogies. 5,6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%