The effectiveness of flagging content belonging to prominent individuals: The case of Donald Trump on Twitter

Abstract

There is vigorous debate as to whether influential social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook should censor objectionable posts by prominent individuals in the United States and elsewhere. A tentative middle ground is employing content moderation to signal to social media audiences that certain posts may contain objectionable information through the mechanism of flagging. Existing studies have mainly examined the effect of flagging regular users' content. To add to this emerging literature stream, we examine the effect of flagging when the underlying content is produced by a prominent individual. Leveraging Twitter's moderation activities on former U.S. President Donald Trump's tweets as our empirical setting, we employ three machine learning algorithms to estimate the effect of flagging Trump's tweets. We explore preliminary evidence as to whether these posts were retweeted less or more than expected. Our results indicate that the flagged tweets were retweeted at higher rates than expected. Our findings suggest that flagging content of prominent individuals on social media might be ineffective or even counterproductive in curbing the spread of content deemed objectionable by social media companies.

Communicating shared situational awareness in times of chaos: Social media and theCOVID‐19 pandemic

“…Social media, such as forums, microblogging, and social networking, are Internet‐based applications built on the technological and ideological foundations of Web 2.0 that offer real‐time information and can significantly influence people's attitudes, beliefs, and decisions (Chipidza & Yan, 2022; Lee & Smith, 2022; Varathan et al, 2017).…”

Moral judgment of objectionable online content: Reporting decisions and punishment preferences on social media

“…Depictions or promotions of psychologically and physically damaging behaviours, attitudes, or experiences encompass the broad spectrum of online content which may be considered harmful [ 3 , 4 ]. The consequences of exposure to such content are varied, with a large body of research associating exposure to negative online content with, for example, increased self-harm behaviours and suicidal ideation in vulnerable populations [ 5 ], elevation of extreme violence within communities [ 6 ], and widespread dissemination of fake news, terrorist propaganda and ensuing political polarisation across society [ 7 , 8 ]. Consequently, the regulation of online harm has risen high on the agenda of social media platforms and has been deemed to one of the greatest concerns for governments, supranational bodies, and international organisations [ 9 , 10 ].…”