2014
DOI: 10.14740/jcs207w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma in Evaluating Blunt Abdominal Trauma With a Seatbelt Mark Sign

Abstract: Background: Specific injury patterns have been recognized from seatbelt use including hollow viscous, mesenteric, and musculoskeletal injuries. We aimed to evaluate if focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is a reliable screening tool for the initial evaluation of the blunt abdominal trauma patient with a seatbelt sign.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is a highly effective first screening tool for initial classification of abdominal trauma patients. 4 Based on the results of the study of Behboodi and his colleagues, (2016), only 68.9% of the positive FAST findings in patients with blunt abdominal trauma and stable hemodynamics was confirmed by abdominopelvic CT scan. 5 The management of hemodynamically stable patients who present following a penetrating abdominal injury (PAI) remains variable between mandatory surgical exploration and more selective non-operative approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is a highly effective first screening tool for initial classification of abdominal trauma patients. 4 Based on the results of the study of Behboodi and his colleagues, (2016), only 68.9% of the positive FAST findings in patients with blunt abdominal trauma and stable hemodynamics was confirmed by abdominopelvic CT scan. 5 The management of hemodynamically stable patients who present following a penetrating abdominal injury (PAI) remains variable between mandatory surgical exploration and more selective non-operative approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%