The Effectiveness of Global Constructed Shallow Waterbody Design Guidelines to Limit Harmful Algal Blooms

Abstract

Constructed shallow waterbodies are often designed and built to limit harmful algal blooms in urban regions. Efforts to reduce algal bloom occurrence in these waterbodies have largely focused on waterbody design, catchment criteria and onsite engineering options. However, many constructed shallow waterbodies that comply with design guidelines still experience harmful algal blooms. Identifying the knowledge gaps in current guidelines and examining their recommended design criteria can improve their effectiveness to reduce algal outbreaks. Here, we reviewed 66 global guidelines and identified common design criteria. The use of a ‘one size fits all' empirical approach and dated literature are common issues associated with the design criteria recommended. Further, only approximately one third of the guidelines that were analyzed directly mentioned harmful algal bloom‐related design criteria. To test the validity of these design values in a real‐world setting, the suitability of design factors in limiting harmful algal blooms was assessed by analyzing 222 shallow waterbodies monitored over a 9 year period in southeastern Australia. The site analysis indicated that macrophyte area to surface area ratio, shoreline development index, and fetch are the three most influential single design factors associated with harmful algal bloom reduction. The analyses highlighted the ineffectiveness of the existing design criteria globally, with blooms occurring even though some waterbodies were designed in accordance with recommended parameters. The analysis suggested that understanding interactions between multiple design factors may be a useful approach, for example, when considering the macrophyte area to surface area ratio in combination with the shoreline development index.

Assessing the Impact of Weirs on Water Quality and Phytoplankton Dynamics in the South Han River: A Two-Year Study

“…A substantial (23%) improvement in water quality conditions was observed concurrently with Microcystis proliferation, highlighting a direct correlation between these environmental factors and the overall health of the ecosystem. To address cyanobacterial blooms and enhance water quality, this study recommends a comprehensive approach that includes reducing nitrogen levels, optimizing HRT, and moderating water temperature [86,[99][100][101].…”

Incorporating Microbial Species Interaction in Management of Freshwater Toxic Cyanobacteria: A Systems Science Challenge

“…Attempting to target toxic cyanobacteria in isolation (e.g., with algaecides) may thus make aquatic species more vulnerable to pathogens and parasites in the same way that antibiotic treatments of bacterial infection can promote candidiasis (systemic yeast infection) in human patients [175,176]. Just as physicians evaluate risk factors such as age, body weight, immune status, and likelihood of exposure to opportunistic pathogens to avoid this scenario and select appropriate courses of treatment [177][178][179], water resource managers can utilize information regarding the aquatic system such as food web structure [180], spatial structure [181] and history of disturbance (including previous HAB events [182]) to select optimal methods for controlling toxic cyanobacteria. Considering such ecological complexities will reduce the potential for non-target effects and potentially increase the efficiency of these methods by helping to determine the appropriate combination and sequence for methods targeting the respective cyanobacterial and fungal threats.…”

Effective Early Treatment of Microcystis Exponential Growth and Microcystin Production with Hydrogen Peroxide and Hydroxyapatite

“…Therefore, effective HCB prevention strategies are essential to ensuring natural surface water quality and protecting public health and the environment. Developing effective, cost-efficient, and environmentally friendly control strategies will greatly benefit freshwater ecosystems and society [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”