2017
DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2017.1344717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of Habitat for Humanity as a neighborhood stabilization program: The case of Charlotte, North Carolina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach allows for differences in competition, race, population and income growth, and urban form to be controlled for between the subject and control sites. This counterfactual technique borrows from Isserman and Merrifield’s (1987) study of regional growth and has been used to evaluate the impact of opportunity zones on employment growth (Arefeva et al 2020) as well as housing development and neighborhood stability (Delmelle et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows for differences in competition, race, population and income growth, and urban form to be controlled for between the subject and control sites. This counterfactual technique borrows from Isserman and Merrifield’s (1987) study of regional growth and has been used to evaluate the impact of opportunity zones on employment growth (Arefeva et al 2020) as well as housing development and neighborhood stability (Delmelle et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%