2010
DOI: 10.1071/nb10007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of harm reduction in preventing HIV among injecting drug users

Abstract: Abstract:There is now compelling evidence that harm reduction approaches to HIV prevention among injecting drug users are effective, safe and cost-effective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The march towards a successful HIV-vaccine has become compellingly close [11]. Both needle exchange and opioid substitution [12,13] programs and improved approaches to blood transfusion [14,15] have been shown to reduce HIV transmission. In 2013, 2.1 million new HIV infections were reported, 38% lower than those reported in 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The march towards a successful HIV-vaccine has become compellingly close [11]. Both needle exchange and opioid substitution [12,13] programs and improved approaches to blood transfusion [14,15] have been shown to reduce HIV transmission. In 2013, 2.1 million new HIV infections were reported, 38% lower than those reported in 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the timely introduction of harm reduction interventions could prevent an explosion in HIV prevalence, as has occurred in other countries (Mathers et al, 2008). Preventing a widespread epidemic among PWID has been accomplished in many locations, including Australia and parts of the United Kingdom, where interventions were implemented before or at an early stage of viral diffusion (Iversen, Wand, Topp, Kaldor, & Maher, 2014; Stimson, 1995, 1996; Wodak & Maher, 2010). These examples illustrate that early prevention can be effective in both keeping HIV prevalence low among PWID and preventing the rapid spread of HIV within injection networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given their relatively low costs and evidence of effectiveness, NSPs are recognized as one of the most cost-effective public health interventions ever funded (International, 2012). Studies in numerous countries have repeatedly provided compelling evidence that NSPs are cost-effective both from societal and health sector perspectives (Vickerman, Miners, & Williams, 2008;Wodak & Maher, 2010). A systematic review found that all 12 included studies that examined the impact of NSPs on HIV infection found that NSPs were cost-effective according to the studies' defined willingness-to-pay thresholds (Jones, Pickering, Sumnall, McVeigh, & Bellis, 2008).…”
Section: Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness Of Nspsmentioning
confidence: 96%