1996
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1996.00440140067006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of Implementing the Weight-Based Heparin Nomogram as a Practice Guideline

Abstract: The weight-based heparin nomogram was well accepted by clinicians at our institution and led to more aggressive heparin dosing and improvements in intermediate outcomes, without increasing bleeding. Mitigation of benefit is likely to occur when practice guidelines are moved from the realm of efficacy research into clinical practice. Therefore, the effectiveness of such measures requires monitoring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of patients achieving a therapeutic PTT within 24 hours is less, however, than the 77% to 99% proportion reported by a number of hospitals following the introduction of dosing nomograms. 8,10,[13][14][15][16] One other study showed that use of a nomogram allowed achievement of this goal in 66% of patients, but this was a marked improvement over the 38% of patients who reached the goal prior to the nomogram. 9 None of the hospitals in the study was routinely using a dosing nomogram by the end of 1992; therefore, such protocols likely represent one way to improve heparin dosing practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportion of patients achieving a therapeutic PTT within 24 hours is less, however, than the 77% to 99% proportion reported by a number of hospitals following the introduction of dosing nomograms. 8,10,[13][14][15][16] One other study showed that use of a nomogram allowed achievement of this goal in 66% of patients, but this was a marked improvement over the 38% of patients who reached the goal prior to the nomogram. 9 None of the hospitals in the study was routinely using a dosing nomogram by the end of 1992; therefore, such protocols likely represent one way to improve heparin dosing practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions have been studies of hospitals where heparin dosing nomograms have been used to guide therapy and the proportion of patients achieving adequate anticoagulation within 24 hours of the initiation of heparin has been significantly higher. 8,10,[13][14][15][16] Each of these studies, however, reflects practice in one or only a few hospitals. Further, none has examined other important features of heparin dosing, such as the frequency with which platelet counts are monitored, or the extent to which early initiation of warfarin therapy has been adopted in the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversy exists whether subtherapeutic aPTT increases the risk of recurrent thromboembolic events (4)(5)(6)23,38,39). Although it is reasonable to believe that a greater delay to reach threshold anticoagulation should lead to a greater number of adverse arterial and venous thrombotic events, the limited number of patients in this study does not permit to evaluate such clinical end points.…”
Section: Obesitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…41 Therapy in acute PE is usually started with 80 units/kg of UFH as bolus followed by 18 units/kg/hour by continuous IV infusion with monitoring of activated partial thromboplastine time (aPTT between 1.5 to 2.5 times control). 50 However, the dose of UFH should not be increased > 40,000 units/day despite aPTT ratio being in the subtherapeutic range, if the antifactor Xa heparin level is > 0.35 IU/mL (51). UFH is also preferred over LMWHs in patients with severe renal impairment with creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min and in those at high-risk of bleeding.…”
Section: Heparinsmentioning
confidence: 99%