The Effectiveness of Incentives for Residential Energy Conservation

Abstract

Studies evaluating incentive programs for residential energy efficiency are examined to assess the roles of the size and type of incentive and of nonfinancial aspects of the programs and to infer lessons for policy. Larger incentives are found to increase participation, but marketing and implementation may be more important than incentive size: participation varies tenfold between programs offering identical financial incentives, with more participation in programs operated by trusted organizations and aggressively marketed by word of mouth and other attention-getting methods. Preference for grants versus loans varies with income and other household characteristics. Low-income households can be reached by strong incentives if marketing and implementation are designed carefully.AUTHORS' NOTE: This article is based on our work as members and staff of the

Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions

“…We based our plasticity estimates on empirical studies of responses to interventions at the individual and household levels aimed at changing energy consumption and related environmentally significant behaviors (12,14,21,22) and on studies of interventions to induce adoption of health-promoting behaviors that resemble energy-saving behaviors (23)(24)(25). These studies make it possible to consider how plasticity is affected by types of intervention (e.g., media campaigns, information, and financial incentives) separately and in combinations and also by the type of behavior (12)(13)(14).…”

“…It facilitates consideration of the effects of both economic and non-economic stimuli in the same analysis. This is important because evidence from past energy efficiency interventions indicates that responsiveness to price can vary by a factor of 10, depending on nonfinancial aspects of policy implementation (21).…”

“…Plasticity is estimated from the most effective documented weatherization programs, which have combined financial incentives (grants or rebates covering most of the retrofit cost), convenience features (e.g., one-stop shopping), quality assurance (e.g., certification for contractors, inspection of work), and strong social marketing. The highest recorded plasticity is 85% over 27 months (28); rates of 15-20% per year have been recorded several times (21). Assuming the most effective interventions are deployed, we estimate plasticity of 80% in 5 years and 90% in 10 years, except for furnaces and central AC equipment, for which we assume replacement only at the end of the useful life of existing equipment, resulting in 80% plasticity in 10 years.…”

Residential peak electricity demand response—Highlights of some behavioural issues

“…Experimental work conducted by psychologists shows that individuals do not make consistently rational decisions, as suggested by the economists [31]. Time inconsistency, reference dependence and bounded rationality are some of the examples cited in the literature as far as energy use is concerned [32].…”

Exploring the links between community-based governance and sustainable energy use: Quantitative evidence from Flanders

“…2 Indeed, CBE projects may raise their members' awareness about sustainable energy practices through communication channels and information provision. Again, norms are likely to play a role in this respect as the trustworthiness of the sources of information can positively affect the effectiveness of a message (Laskey and Syler, 2013;Stern et al, 1986). Yet, these studies are usually unspecific about the behaviors considered, looking for example at 'lifestyles' or 'social change' and do not evaluate to which extent these behaviors are actually affected.…”