The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review

Abstract

BackgroundInformal caregivers of people with dementia are challenged in managing the consequences of dementia in daily life. The objective of this meta-review was to synthesize evidence from previous systematic reviews about professional self-management support interventions for this group.MethodsIn March 2014, searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase and PsycINFO. The PRISMA Statement was followed. Interventions were grouped using Martin’s targets of self-management, covering 5 targets: relationship with family, maintaining an active lifestyle, psychological wellbeing, techniques to cope with memory changes and information about dementia. Using an evidence synthesis, the outcomes from the included interventions were synthesized and conclusions were drawn about the level of evidence for the effectiveness of interventions within each target.ResultsTen high-quality systematic reviews were selected. Evidence exists for the effectiveness of professional self-management support interventions targeting psychological wellbeing on stress and social outcomes of informal caregivers. In addition, evidence exists for the effectiveness of interventions targeting information on ability/knowledge. Limited evidence was found for the effectiveness of interventions targeting techniques to cope with memory change on coping skills and mood, and for interventions targeting information on the outcomes sense of competence and decision-making confidence of informal caregivers.ConclusionsScientific evidence exists for the effectiveness of a number of professional self-management support interventions targeting psychological wellbeing and information. Health care professionals could take account of the fact that psycho-education was integrated in most of the self-management support interventions that were found to be effective in this meta-review. Furthermore, longer and more intensive interventions were associated with greater effects.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0145-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Living with a partner with dementia: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of spouses' lived experiences of changes in their everyday lives

“…Worldwide, a multisector approach that targets the needs and perspectives of persons with dementia and their relatives has been prioritised (Sundheds-og AEldreministeriet [The Ministry of Health], 2016; World health Organization, 2012). Interventions that are aimed at caregivers predominantly focus on education programmes, including the provision of coping and support strategies and selfmanagement support (Dam, De Vugt, Klinkenberg, Verhey, & Van Boxtel, 2016;Gilhooly et al, 2016;Huis in het Veld, Verkaik, Mistiaen, van Meijel, & Francke, 2015;Jensen, Agbata, Canavan, & McCarthy, 2015;Letts et al, 2011;Li, Cooper, Austin, & Livingston, 2013;Vandepitte et al, 2016).…”

The influence of Chinese culture on family caregivers of stroke survivors: A qualitative study

“…Family caregivers may encounter various health problems, such as social isolation, depression, self‐care ignorance and even death, because they may easily ignore their health status due to the heavy caregiving responsibilities at the age when they themselves may develop one or even more chronic diseases that require constant medical monitoring and self‐care (Bodenheimer, Lorig, Holman, & Grumback, ; Crankshaw, Rabiner, & O'Keeffe, ; Katbamna, Bhakta, Ahmad, Baker, & Parker, ; McGarry & Arthur, ; Navaie‐Waliser et al., ). As a result, this study infers that self‐care is of immense significance for both family caregivers and patients (Huis In Het Veld, Verkaik, Mistiaen, van Meijel, & Francke, ).…”

Knowledge evaluation instruments for dementia caregiver education programs: A scoping review

“…Informal and formal caregivers are likely to have very different education and training needs given their different roles in caregiving. Despite the limited number of education and training programs that were specifically focused on informal caregivers (e.g., family caregivers), the majority of these studies found that programs were successful at improving self‐perceived competence and ability in providing care . Additionally, studies that focused on formal caregivers (e.g., nurse, physicians) found that education and training programs were successful at improving attitudes, communication, confidence and ability to provide care .…”