2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5452-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing the incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing the incidence and duration of delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Short running titleNon-pharmacological interventions for delirium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nurses should assess gaps between the patient's prehospitalization and current functional abilities and should support functional reconciliation. Non‐pharmacological interventions can also be important to restore the patient's ordinary daily function in the hospital environment . Family involvement also plays a key role .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurses should assess gaps between the patient's prehospitalization and current functional abilities and should support functional reconciliation. Non‐pharmacological interventions can also be important to restore the patient's ordinary daily function in the hospital environment . Family involvement also plays a key role .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating non-pharmacological interventions for delirium management in critically ill patients to determine which interventions were most effective for reducing the incidence and/or duration of delirium (9) . Findings indicated a number of effective interventions, some that could be delivered singly or in combination (11 -19) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…134 Consequently, there are no comprehensive data supporting the use of bright-light therapy in the critically-ill patients. 135,136 Within a systematic review evaluating the effect of light and darkness on the outcome of ICU patients, the authors emphasize that heterogeneity among interventions and designs is high, which makes interpretation of results and a general conclusion difficult. 137 Major limitations among most of the reviewed studies are that patients were either sedated or that depth of sedation was poorly documented.…”
Section: Using Artificial Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%