2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-022-10297-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of self-regulated strategy development on improving English writing: Evidence from the last decade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical evidence emerged in our research also supports the social cognitive theory ( Bandura, 1986 ) and previous research on self-regulation and language learning strategies (i.e., Oxford, 1990 , 1996 , 2011 , 2015 ; Zimmerman, 2000 ; Bai and Wang, 2020 ; Sun et al, 2022 ). As a result, this study contributes to the theory of self-regulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Empirical evidence emerged in our research also supports the social cognitive theory ( Bandura, 1986 ) and previous research on self-regulation and language learning strategies (i.e., Oxford, 1990 , 1996 , 2011 , 2015 ; Zimmerman, 2000 ; Bai and Wang, 2020 ; Sun et al, 2022 ). As a result, this study contributes to the theory of self-regulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…English language instructors may need to adopt SRL strategy development approach to help students gain more SRL strategies. A recent meta-analysis of 22 primary studies has provided a strong and positive link between the use of SRL strategies and language learning outcomes ( Sun et al, 2022 ). In this study, we have advanced the SRL literature by introducing a new instrument to measure college students’ use of SRL strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, two indicators of the duration of intervention, weeks the intervention ran and total amount of instruction time in hours, did not moderate the effects on L2 learning achievement. This finding is in line with meta-analytic studies conducted in L1 contexts (e.g., Dignath and Büttner, 2008;Koster et al, 2015;Sun et al, 2022), which reported that the duration of interventions did not significantly impact participants' language learning outcomes. As for the intensity of interventions, the duration of each session in minutes did not produce a significant effect, either.…”
Section: E Ectiveness Of Srl Interventions On L Learning Achievementssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The positive results from this study add to previous metaanalytic findings (e.g., Jansen et al, 2019;Theobald, 2021;Sun et al, 2022) that indicated positive effects of SRL interventions on students' academic achievements. Specifically, similar to previous meta-analyses that revealed a large effect of SRL interventions for L1 learning (e.g., Graham et al, 2012), a large effect was also obtained for L2 learning achievements, which served as evidence in support of the effectiveness of SRL interventions for language learning in both L1 and L2 contexts.…”
Section: E Ectiveness Of Srl Interventions On L Learning Achievementssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation