2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2005.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of strategic information systems planning under environmental uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
209
1
21

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
11
209
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…The researchers examined the standardized regression weights for the research's indicators and found that all indicators had a high loading towards the latent variables except FE4 = 0.35, SC3 = 0.47, and GS4 = 0.42. Moreover, since these items did not meet the minimum recommended value of factor loadings of 0.50 (Newkirk & Lederer, 2006;Hair et al, 2010;Kline, 2010), they were all removed and excluded from further analysis.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers examined the standardized regression weights for the research's indicators and found that all indicators had a high loading towards the latent variables except FE4 = 0.35, SC3 = 0.47, and GS4 = 0.42. Moreover, since these items did not meet the minimum recommended value of factor loadings of 0.50 (Newkirk & Lederer, 2006;Hair et al, 2010;Kline, 2010), they were all removed and excluded from further analysis.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular (PU4 = 0.246, PE1 = 0.398, FC4 = 0.378, FC5 = 0.379, FC6 = 0.339, BI4 = 0.401). Moreover, since all of these items did not meet the minimum recommended value of factor loadings of 0.50 (Newkirk and Lederer, 2006), they were all removed and excluded from further analysis [39].…”
Section: Convergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected our data at two points in time because a two-stage survey approach can provide superior quality data [68][69][70]. Furthermore, the potential common-method variance bias increases when using cross-sectional datasets and obtaining both dependent and independent measures from the same individuals [71][72][73]. Thus, time-variant measures of our constructs help to ensure the reliability and validity of our measurement scale [73].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%