2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10371-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of the GeoGebra Programme in the development of academic achievement and survival of the learning impact of the mathematics among secondary stage students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed cycle model was evaluated and brought positive changes to students' learning of differential calculus, in terms of both perception and scores. The study satisfied the principles of the fourth educational revolution which are that the teaching and learning process should be reshaped (Ally & Wark, 2020) and consistent with Common Core State Standards that do not recommend traditional teaching and learning approaches (Alabdulaziz et al, 2021). This study thus produced the cycle model for teaching and learning differential calculus using technology (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).…”
Section: Findings Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The developed cycle model was evaluated and brought positive changes to students' learning of differential calculus, in terms of both perception and scores. The study satisfied the principles of the fourth educational revolution which are that the teaching and learning process should be reshaped (Ally & Wark, 2020) and consistent with Common Core State Standards that do not recommend traditional teaching and learning approaches (Alabdulaziz et al, 2021). This study thus produced the cycle model for teaching and learning differential calculus using technology (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).…”
Section: Findings Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Subsequently, a pilot study was conducted to assess normative values for the dimensions of the variable. The Interface dimension was categorized as inadequate (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), moderate (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29), and appropriate (30-40), while Interactivity was classified as inadequate (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13), moderate (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22), and appropriate (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GeoGebra has reduced the gaps in the acquisition of mathematical competencies, providing positive outcomes for problem-solving and attitude change among students [2] . This event mobilized the academic community towards research in multiple scenarios: learning improvement and dispositional factors involved in the adoption of GeoGebra software [10,11,13,[16][17][18][19][20] . A few studies have been done on the optimal integration of GeoGebra and meaningful learning [21,22] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ese findings align with a study that found that female students learning a given course with the help of GeoGebra achieved scores superior to those of a control group taught by traditional methods. ey also showed greater survival of learning impact, defined by learning output retained in memory as indicated in scores on a posttest [19,43].…”
Section: Analysis Of Group Differences In Posttest Of Differentialmentioning
confidence: 99%