2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of Treatments for Patients With Medication Overuse Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
49
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Another randomized, single‐blinded trial failed to show superiority of IV methylprednisolone, nor IV acetaminophen versus IV placebo in reducing withdrawal headache intensity 13 . Meta‐analysis did not find evidence that prednisone significantly reduced headache days during the withdrawal stage versus placebo 14 …”
Section: Managing the Headache Patient With Medication Overusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another randomized, single‐blinded trial failed to show superiority of IV methylprednisolone, nor IV acetaminophen versus IV placebo in reducing withdrawal headache intensity 13 . Meta‐analysis did not find evidence that prednisone significantly reduced headache days during the withdrawal stage versus placebo 14 …”
Section: Managing the Headache Patient With Medication Overusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…48,52 In the latter study of OBTA, the therapeutic gain was only 2 d/mo. 56 A recent population-based study by Hepp et al 57 showed that the adherence to oral migraine prophylactics in patients with chronic migraine is only 25% after 6 months and more than 50% discontinue the new prophylactic drug during the first two months due to adverse events and lack of effect on headache. 56 A recent population-based study by Hepp et al 57 showed that the adherence to oral migraine prophylactics in patients with chronic migraine is only 25% after 6 months and more than 50% discontinue the new prophylactic drug during the first two months due to adverse events and lack of effect on headache.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 Even though this difference was statistically significant, this effect cannot be con- AEDs or OBTA as prophylactic treatment to MOH patients. 56 A recent population-based study by Hepp et al 57 showed that the adherence to oral migraine prophylactics in patients with chronic migraine is only 25% after 6 months and more than 50% discontinue the new prophylactic drug during the first two months due to adverse events and lack of effect on headache. On this basis, it is very relevant to consider awaiting initiation of prophylactic medication until after the effect of detoxification alone is known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the highest impact journals, many trialists continue to inadequately report or calculate sample sizes . In the headache literature, one needs to look no further than recent systematic reviews to understand the commonality of underpowered studies …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In the headache literature, one needs to look no further than recent systematic reviews to understand the commonality of underpowered studies. [2][3][4][5][6] In this issue, Turner and Houle clearly and eloquently summarize the role that statistical power calculations play in research design, the key elements required to calculate statistical power, common problems with power calculations and, finally, they propose advice for researchers planning studies. As outlined in their manuscript, the foundation of scientific research is hypothesis testing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%