2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis interventions in trauma patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Serena Peng,
Mandy Zhang,
James Jin
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have examined the effectiveness of VTE prophylaxis in patients with femoral neck fractures undergoing hip arthroplasty and reported superior reductions compared to other agents 7 . On the other hand, the review analysis of VTE risk in patients with hip and lower limb injuries, including eight studies and 17,698 patients, showed that aspirin signi cantly did not reduced the risk of DVT compared to placebo (relative risk (RR): 0.47; 95%CI: 0.05-2.65) 23 . While several studies have reported that aspirin is an effective prophylactic agent for VTE, there have been skeptical evaluations and an identi cation of a lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials supporting its use in this context, necessitating further research 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have examined the effectiveness of VTE prophylaxis in patients with femoral neck fractures undergoing hip arthroplasty and reported superior reductions compared to other agents 7 . On the other hand, the review analysis of VTE risk in patients with hip and lower limb injuries, including eight studies and 17,698 patients, showed that aspirin signi cantly did not reduced the risk of DVT compared to placebo (relative risk (RR): 0.47; 95%CI: 0.05-2.65) 23 . While several studies have reported that aspirin is an effective prophylactic agent for VTE, there have been skeptical evaluations and an identi cation of a lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials supporting its use in this context, necessitating further research 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%