The Effectiveness of Visualization, Auditory, Kinesthetic (VAK) Model toward Writing Narrative: Linguistic Intelligence Perspective

Kusumawarti, Etika; Subiyantoro, Slamet; Rukayah, Rukayah

doi:10.29333/iji.2020.13442a

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Dealing with the finding that learning style preference gives effect on learners' writing performance, the finding is supported by other scholars (Kusumawarti et al, 2020;Pratama et al, 2017;Kayalar & Kayalar, 2017;Rahayu et al, 2017;Rambe, 2014;Gilakjani, 2012). There are some advantages of the VAK learning model in L2 writing classes; e.g., learners can learn in different styles and be more easily focused and engaged.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Measuring the Effect of Learning Style Preference on Learners’ Argumentative Essay Writing Across Different Writing Strategies

2023

JHETP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The investigation attempted to measure the effect of learning style preference across two different writing strategies in writing classes. The 58 subjects recruited from L2 classes comprised 19 visual, 21 auditory, and 18 kinesthetic learners. A 3x2 analysis of variance test was applied to work with the experimental data. The output confirmed a statistically significant interaction effect occurred among types of writing strategy (x1) and learning style preference (x2) on learners' writing performance (y) at F (2, 57) =5.754, p= 0.006. There was also a significant effect of learning style preference at F (1, 57) = 70.949, p = 0.000. The analysis showed that learning style preference differed significantly among the three groups. Here, visual and auditory performed better on average than kinesthetic learners for writing performance. The main effect also confirmed a statistically significant effect of types of writing strategy occurred at F (2, 57) = 22.884, p = 0.000. Here, graphic organizers (GOs) differed significantly from non-graphic organizers (NGOs).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Measuring the Effect of Learning Style Preference on Learners’ Argumentative Essay Writing Across Different Writing Strategies

2023

JHETP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The VAK learning is focused on providing direct experience by seeing (visual), learning by hearing (auditory), and learning by movement and emotional (kinesthetic) (Ferreira & Rodríguez, 2022;Kusumawarti et al, 2020;Zulfadewina et al, 2020). In addition, VAK learning makes group learning and each student is required to play an active role so as to make learning more active and effective.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of visual, auditory, kinesthetic (VAK) learning to increase student learning outcomes

Rosdiana

Muslimin

Firmansyah³

2022

Inornatus Biol. Educ. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study uses classroom action research. The research objective is to apply the visual, auditory, kinesthetic (VAK) learning model to improve student learning outcomes. The subjects in this study were teachers and students of grade IV primary school totaling 24 students. Data collection techniques used are observation, tests, and documentation. Actions have been done as much as 2 cycles. Data is calculated using percentages. The findings reveal that the learning outcomes of cycle I are in the sufficient category, and there is an increase in cycle II which is in the good category. The conclusion in this study is that the application of VAK learning can improve the learning process and student science learning outcomes.

show abstract

“…Dealing with the finding that learning style preference, (here, visual learners) gives effect on writing accuracy, the study was in accordance with Alnujaidi, 2018;Kusumawarti, Subiyantoro, & Rukayah, 2018;Rezeki, Sagala, & Damanik, 2018;Şener & Çokçalışkan, 2018;Siregar, 2018;Sabarun, 2021. Therefore, it is recommended that teachers should introduce and classify learners about their learning styles and preference.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Effectiveness of Graphic Organizers on EFL Learners’ Writing Performance Across Different Learning Style Preference and Gender at Higher Education

Sabarun,

Widiati,

Suryati

et al. 2023

JHETP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research investigated the interaction effect amongst types of writing strategy (x1), learning styles (x2), and gender (x3) on writing accuracy (y) at Islamic University Students. The 70 participants consisted of three groups based on types of writing strategy: free writing (n= 34) versus graphic organizers (n=36); types of learning styles : visual (n=22) versus auditory (n=26) versus kinesthetic (n=22); and gender (x3): male (32), female (38). A three-way ANOVA test was applied in the investigation. The study revealed that an interaction effect occurred amongst three variables on average of writing accuracy at F (2, 69) =3.34, p=0.02, eta 0.10. Then, the interaction effect also occurred between writing strategy and learning styles at F (2, 69) =7.40, p=0.01; and between learning styles and gender at F (2, 69) =6.56, p=0.03. On the contrary, the interaction effect did not occur between writing strategy and gender at F (1, 69) =1.79, p=0.19. Further investigation is needed to validate the finding.

show abstract

The Effectiveness of Visualization, Auditory, Kinesthetic (VAK) Model toward Writing Narrative: Linguistic Intelligence Perspective

Cited by 7 publications

References 30 publications

Measuring the Effect of Learning Style Preference on Learners’ Argumentative Essay Writing Across Different Writing Strategies

Measuring the Effect of Learning Style Preference on Learners’ Argumentative Essay Writing Across Different Writing Strategies

The use of visual, auditory, kinesthetic (VAK) learning to increase student learning outcomes

Exploring the Effectiveness of Graphic Organizers on EFL Learners’ Writing Performance Across Different Learning Style Preference and Gender at Higher Education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About