2014
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of working wrist splints in adults with rheumatoid arthritis: A mixed methods systematic review

Abstract: Working wrist splints reduce pain and improve grip in rheumatoid arthritis. The effect of splints on function is not yet clear.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Included studies were rated according to scoring of 9–10, 6–8 and 4–5, and were interpreted as “excellent”, “good” and “fair” quality studies 78 , respectively. Inadequate randomization, non-blinding of assessors, no intention to treat analysis and no measurement of compliance were considered as major threats for biasing 79 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included studies were rated according to scoring of 9–10, 6–8 and 4–5, and were interpreted as “excellent”, “good” and “fair” quality studies 78 , respectively. Inadequate randomization, non-blinding of assessors, no intention to treat analysis and no measurement of compliance were considered as major threats for biasing 79 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included studies were rated, and interpreted according to scoring of 9-10, 6-8 and 4-5 considered of “excellent”, “good” and “fair” quality [ 85 ], respectively. Inadequate randomization, non-blinding of assessors, no intention to treat analysis and no measurement of compliance were considered as major threats to biasing [ 86 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included studies were rated, and interpreted according to scoring of 9–10, 6–8, and 4–5 considered of “excellent,” “good,” and “fair” quality ( 74 ), respectively. Inadequate randomization, non-blinding of assessors, no intention to treat analysis and no measurement of compliance were considered as major threats to biasing ( 75 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%