Effectors in Plant–Microbe Interactions 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781119949138.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectors of Smut Fungi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, expression of the U. maydis effector Pit2 (93 aa), was identified as a requirement for tumour formation (Doehlemann et al ., 2011a). U. maydis effector proteins typically have a secretion signal, are upregulated during in planta growth, and lack similarity to known proteins (reviewed in Doehlemann et al ., 2011b). Predicted proteins for eight U. maydis NATs contain recognizable secretion signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, expression of the U. maydis effector Pit2 (93 aa), was identified as a requirement for tumour formation (Doehlemann et al ., 2011a). U. maydis effector proteins typically have a secretion signal, are upregulated during in planta growth, and lack similarity to known proteins (reviewed in Doehlemann et al ., 2011b). Predicted proteins for eight U. maydis NATs contain recognizable secretion signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%