2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-3785-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects and the Mechanisms of Board Gender Diversity: Evidence from Financial Manipulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
161
1
14

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
12
161
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Barua et al (2010) reported that companies with female CFOs have earnings of a greater quality and such companies are substantially associated with an improvement of accounting conservatism in the financial reporting (Francis et al, 2015). Abbott et al (2012) and Wahid (2018) argue that gender diversity on the board of directors could result in the board making decisions of a higher quality through an increase in interactions and consideration of different points of the view. They found that gender diversity on the board of directors reduces the likelihood of the incidence of financial statements restatement.…”
Section: Empirical Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, Barua et al (2010) reported that companies with female CFOs have earnings of a greater quality and such companies are substantially associated with an improvement of accounting conservatism in the financial reporting (Francis et al, 2015). Abbott et al (2012) and Wahid (2018) argue that gender diversity on the board of directors could result in the board making decisions of a higher quality through an increase in interactions and consideration of different points of the view. They found that gender diversity on the board of directors reduces the likelihood of the incidence of financial statements restatement.…”
Section: Empirical Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research examined the relationship between audit committee characteristics (such as independence, size, expertise, and the frequency of audit committee meetings) and financial restatements (Abbott et al, 2004;Carcello et al, 2011;Lary & Taylor, 2012, Mohammad et al, 2018. Furthermore, Abbott et al (2012) and Wahid (2018) studied the effect of board gender diversity on financial restatements. Nonetheless, the question of whether the presence of women on audit committee is associated with restatements remains unsolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence suggests that firms with females on the board commit fewer financial reporting mistakes and engage in less fraud to such an extent that females improve the board's function through their impact on group dynamics (Wahid, 2018). In addition, males and females differ in many ways, such as cognition, thought, emotion, and work style.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research consistently indicates that corporations with more women on their boards outperform those with less: worldwide, shares of corporations with over $10 billion of market capitalization, and with women board members, outperformed comparable businesses with all‐male boards by 26% over six years (Credit Suisse Research Institute, 2012). Corporations with more women board members exhibited less fraud, corruption, and bribery; engaged in fewer battles with shareholders (DeHaas, Akutagawa & Spriggs, 2019; Lee, Marshall, Rallis, & Moscardi, 2015); transparently disclosed stock prices (Gul, Srinidhi, & Ng, 2011); and had fewer financial reporting errors (Wahid, 2018). Consequently, institutional investors have demanded more gender diversity.…”
Section: Performance Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%