O ver the past 2 decades, we have witnessed an explosive expansion in the armamentarium of noninvasive and invasive imaging technologies capable of providing detailed information about the structure and function of the heart and vasculature. Many of these technologies are integrative (eg, positron emission tomography and computed tomography, positron emission tomography and MRI), thereby compounding the unique strengths of the component technologies to achieve unprecedented improvements to our ability to diagnose disease, improve patient care, and advance biomedical research. In addition, the miniaturization of imaging devices with dramatic increases in sensitivity and spatial resolution, coupled with the development of quantitative molecular imaging approaches for evaluating physiology and pathobiology at the cellular and molecular levels, provides a unique platform for a new era in diagnostic imaging. The crucial role of imaging in early phenotyping of disease, risk assessment, and management guidance is expanding rapidly in ways previously thought unrealistic.Along with clinical, molecular, and genomewide association studies, structural and functional quantitative imaging already plays a critical role in phenotyping cardiovascular disease. Unique strengths of imaging phenotyping include its ability to provide precise, organ-specific anatomic localization and quantification of disease traits, to demonstrate and quantify involvement of other organs in cardiac disease, to provide an opportunity to investigate the time course of disease-specific molecular events in vivo, and to track their response to therapy. In so doing, quantitative structural and functional imaging can provide a nuanced description of disease burden (eg, atherosclerosis, myocarditis), disease subtypes (eg, amyloidosis), and, importantly, the relationship between the specific phenotype and outcomes, thereby informing treatment strategies and allowing more personalized approaches to patient management.Our objectives for this article are to (1) provide a viewpoint regarding the evolving role of cardiovascular imaging in biomedical research and clinical practice, (2) discuss the challenges associated with clinical translation of imaging innovations and the opportunities for multimodality imaging in the changing paradigm of value-based medicine, and (3) briefly outline future challenges and opportunities including the requirements for training future generations of imaging scientists and clinical specialists. Unlike traditional reviews that provide a detailed discussion of the role of 1 or more imaging modalities in cardiovascular (CV) disease, our discussion will focus on the potential role of imaging in what we believe are key areas of the translational highway with specific examples on how structural and functional imaging may contribute to scientific discovery, diagnosis, risk stratification, and patient management in each of those areas.
Redefining the Role of Imaging Across the Continuum of Biomedical Research and Clinical Practice Translati...