2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of a “no-haggle” channel on marketing strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Korn () and Zeng et al . () consider monopolists, and so are silent about the implications of discounts on competitive outcomes, which is the focus of this study . Desai and Purohit () and Zeng et al .…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Korn () and Zeng et al . () consider monopolists, and so are silent about the implications of discounts on competitive outcomes, which is the focus of this study . Desai and Purohit () and Zeng et al .…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desai and Purohit () and Zeng et al . () focus on the marketing decision of whether to permit bargaining or not. In Desai and Purohit (), when both firms permit bargaining, the list prices are irrelevant to the bargainers since they are never effective outside options; thus the strategic interaction between list prices and discount prices is severed.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, I turn to research that compares profits earned under fixed pricing versus negotiations, which explains differences on the basis of isoperfect price discrimination, competition, product quality, relative bargaining power, and bargaining costs (e.g., Arnold and Lippman 1998;Bester 1993;Myatt and Rasmusen 2011;Wang 1995). Another consideration is hybrid pricing, such that sellers post a price but also negotiate with consumers (e.g., Chen and Rosenthal 1996;Cui, Mallucci, and Zhang 2019;Desai and Purohit 2004;Gill and Thanassoulis 2016;Riley and Zeckhauser 1983;Zeng, Dasgupta, and Weinberg 2014). According to contributions in this research stream, competition (Huang 2020;Zhang, Manchanda, and Chu 2021), the fixed costs of initiating a negotiation (Jindal and Newberry 2018), cognitive dissonance, and sunk cost fallacy (Desai and Jindal 2021) all influence the profitability of a hybrid pricing strategy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small and recent literature considers the consequences of discounts and bargaining when some consumers take list or posted prices as given. Korn (2007) and Zeng et al (2007) consider monopolists, and so are silent about the implications of discounts on competitive outcomes, which is the focus of this study. 1 Desai and Purohit (2004) and Zeng et al (2007) focus on the marketing decision of whether to permit bargaining or not.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Korn (2007) and Zeng et al (2007) consider monopolists, and so are silent about the implications of discounts on competitive outcomes, which is the focus of this study. 1 Desai and Purohit (2004) and Zeng et al (2007) focus on the marketing decision of whether to permit bargaining or not. In Desai and Purohit (2004), when both firms permit bargaining, the list prices are irrelevant to the bargainers since they are never effective outside options; thus the strategic interaction between list prices and discount prices is severed.…”
Section: Relation To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%