2013
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of a step-up ractopamine feeding program on growth performance and low-sodium ham characteristics of purebred Berkshire pigs1

Abstract: Objectives were to test the effect of a low-sodium curing solution on processing characteristics of hams from purebred Berkshire pigs that were fed a step-up ractopamine HCl (RAC) feeding program or a negative control diet. Sixty pairs (n=120) of hams were selected from two blocks of purebred Berkshire pigs (n=200) that were fed either a control diet or 7.4 mg of ractopamine/kg of diet for 14 d followed by 10.0 mg of ractopamine/kg of diet for the last 14 d before slaughter. Three-piece, section-formed hams we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement, Carr et al (2005) found that RAC did not affect all s.c. backfat measures and Main et al (2009) reported that 10 mg/kg RAC did not affect loin depth. Apple et al (2008) reported that RAC increased marbling, whereas other studies demonstrate RAC does not affect marbling (Crome et al, 1996;Carr et al, 2005;Bohrer et al, 2013); however, Armstrong et al (2004) found that RAC decreased the amount of Table 3. Performance test and blood parameters of barrows fed a conventional swine finishing diet containing 0 mg/kg ractopamine HCl (CON) or a diet formulated to meet the requirements of finishing barrows fed 10 mg/kg RAC 1 (RAC+) for 32 d marbling.…”
Section: Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In agreement, Carr et al (2005) found that RAC did not affect all s.c. backfat measures and Main et al (2009) reported that 10 mg/kg RAC did not affect loin depth. Apple et al (2008) reported that RAC increased marbling, whereas other studies demonstrate RAC does not affect marbling (Crome et al, 1996;Carr et al, 2005;Bohrer et al, 2013); however, Armstrong et al (2004) found that RAC decreased the amount of Table 3. Performance test and blood parameters of barrows fed a conventional swine finishing diet containing 0 mg/kg ractopamine HCl (CON) or a diet formulated to meet the requirements of finishing barrows fed 10 mg/kg RAC 1 (RAC+) for 32 d marbling.…”
Section: Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Proximate composition was determined by taking the first 2 slices in each of the zones A, B, C, D, and E described above and homogenized in a Cuisinart food processor (CUI DFP-7BC; Cuisinart, East Windsor, NJ). Moisture and fat percentage were determined using the same procedure as outlined in Bohrer et al (2013b). Briefly, a 7-g sample of the homogenate was oven-dried in duplicate at 100°C for at least 24 h to determine percentage moisture.…”
Section: Proximate Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased muscle growth due to ractopamine could possibly demand increased levels of plasma membrane repair proteins to maintain homeostasis. Therefore, the over-abundance of tripartite motifcontaining protein 72 in RAC could be attributed to the increased muscle mass accretion in ractopamine-fed animals (Bohrer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purebred Berkshire pigs were used in this study because they are often used in branded pork programs (McMullen, 2006). Two-hundred purebred Berkshire pigs (barrows and gilts; average initial bodyweight of 68.9 kg) were used as previously described (Bohrer et al, 2013). All animals were raised under similar conditions at The Ohio State University Western Agricultural Research Station (South Charleston, OH, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%