1993
DOI: 10.1123/pes.5.4.339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of a Twice-A-Week Strength Training Program on Children

Abstract: The effectiveness of a twice-a-week strength training program on children was evaluated in 14 boys and girls (mean age 10.8 yrs) who participated in a biweekly training program for 8 weeks. Each subject performed three sets of 10 to 15 repetitions on five exercises with intensities ranging between 50 and 100% of a given 10-repetition maximum (RM). All subjects were preand posttested on the following measures: 10-RM strength, sit and reach flexibility, vertical jump, seated ball put, resting blood pressure, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
60
2
8

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
60
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute increases in chest press strength made by the low repetition-heavy load and high repetition-moderate load groups (0.9 kg and 4.2 kg, respectively) also were lower than results reported previously in short-term investigations involving children. 20,21,26 It is reasonable to conclude that the greater gains in upper body strength in previous investigations compared with those in the present study may be attributable to differences in training volume (ie, the total amount of work performed per training session and per week). It seems that high-volume training programs (eg, 3 sets of 10 to 15 repetitions per exercise with a moderate load) result in greater gains in upper body strength than low-volume training programs.…”
Section: Muscular Strengthcontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The absolute increases in chest press strength made by the low repetition-heavy load and high repetition-moderate load groups (0.9 kg and 4.2 kg, respectively) also were lower than results reported previously in short-term investigations involving children. 20,21,26 It is reasonable to conclude that the greater gains in upper body strength in previous investigations compared with those in the present study may be attributable to differences in training volume (ie, the total amount of work performed per training session and per week). It seems that high-volume training programs (eg, 3 sets of 10 to 15 repetitions per exercise with a moderate load) result in greater gains in upper body strength than low-volume training programs.…”
Section: Muscular Strengthcontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…20,26,27,33 The absolute increase in leg extension strength attributable to low-and highrepetition training (5.7 kg and 7.9 kg, respectively) was less than the increase for same lift in other reports involving children. 20,21,26 Differences in training volume may explain these findings.…”
Section: Muscular Strengthmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations