Dental Wear in Evolutionary and Biocultural Contexts 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815599-8.00005-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of aberrant tooth wear on occlusal relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of dental wear—in the form of macrowear, microwear and/or specific dental wear features (e.g., enamel chipping, notches, occlusal or interproximal grooves, notches, erosion, lingual surface attrition of the maxillary anterior teeth [LSAMAT] and instrumental striations on labial/buccal surfaces)—provides data of biocultural relevance for the reconstruction and understanding of dietary variation, nondietary manipulative behaviours, trauma, pathological conditions, cultural modification of the dentition for social expression of identities, occupation and other indicators of past human lifeways (Alt & Pichler, 1998; d'Incau, Couture, & Maureille, 2012; Krueger, 2015; Krueger, Willman, Matthews, Hublin, & Pérez‐Pérez, 2019; Milner & Larsen, 1991; Molnar, 1972; Schmidt, El Zaatari, & Van Sessen, 2020; Schmidt, Remy, Van Sessen, & Herrmann, 2019). The analysis of specific, idiosyncratic or aberrant dental wear features is particularly illustrative for reconstructions of behaviour and identity (Alt & Pichler, 1998; Crane, Watson, & Haas, 2020; Milner & Larsen, 1991; Molnar, 1972; Stojanowski, Johnson, Paul, & Carver, 2016; Willman, Hernando, Matu, & Crevecoeur, 2020a), since these wear patterns can be coupled with inferences gained from ethnographically, ethnohistorically and clinically documented patterns of atypical tooth‐using tasks and the sociocultural contexts they involve (Barrett, 1977; Berbesque et al, 2012; Crowfoot, 1931; Daly, Bakar, Husein, Ismail, & Amaechi, 2010; Erdal, 2008; Fidalgo, Silva, & Porfírio, 2020; Gould, 1968; Krueger, 2015; Merbs, 1983; Scott & Jolie, 2008; Vogeikoff‐Brogan & Smith, 2010; Wheat, 1967).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of dental wear—in the form of macrowear, microwear and/or specific dental wear features (e.g., enamel chipping, notches, occlusal or interproximal grooves, notches, erosion, lingual surface attrition of the maxillary anterior teeth [LSAMAT] and instrumental striations on labial/buccal surfaces)—provides data of biocultural relevance for the reconstruction and understanding of dietary variation, nondietary manipulative behaviours, trauma, pathological conditions, cultural modification of the dentition for social expression of identities, occupation and other indicators of past human lifeways (Alt & Pichler, 1998; d'Incau, Couture, & Maureille, 2012; Krueger, 2015; Krueger, Willman, Matthews, Hublin, & Pérez‐Pérez, 2019; Milner & Larsen, 1991; Molnar, 1972; Schmidt, El Zaatari, & Van Sessen, 2020; Schmidt, Remy, Van Sessen, & Herrmann, 2019). The analysis of specific, idiosyncratic or aberrant dental wear features is particularly illustrative for reconstructions of behaviour and identity (Alt & Pichler, 1998; Crane, Watson, & Haas, 2020; Milner & Larsen, 1991; Molnar, 1972; Stojanowski, Johnson, Paul, & Carver, 2016; Willman, Hernando, Matu, & Crevecoeur, 2020a), since these wear patterns can be coupled with inferences gained from ethnographically, ethnohistorically and clinically documented patterns of atypical tooth‐using tasks and the sociocultural contexts they involve (Barrett, 1977; Berbesque et al, 2012; Crowfoot, 1931; Daly, Bakar, Husein, Ismail, & Amaechi, 2010; Erdal, 2008; Fidalgo, Silva, & Porfírio, 2020; Gould, 1968; Krueger, 2015; Merbs, 1983; Scott & Jolie, 2008; Vogeikoff‐Brogan & Smith, 2010; Wheat, 1967).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dental macrowear is the progressive and irreversible reduction of the tooth hard tissue (Figure 5.13) (D'Incau et al, 2012) and results from the interplay between several behavioral (occupational activities, food preparation, idiosyncratic behaviors), dietary (food texture and composition), pathological and physiological (age, sex, occlusion, and TMJ symptomatology) factors (Crane et al, 2020;D'Incau et al, 2012;Seligman et al, 1988). The interrelated mechanisms that operate during its expression are erosion, at-trition and abrasion, and they are caused by food-related acids, natural friction between opposing teeth and external mechanical masticatory or non-masticatory forces, respectively Kieser et al, 2001).…”
Section: Dental Macrowearmentioning
confidence: 99%