“…The analysis of dental wear—in the form of macrowear, microwear and/or specific dental wear features (e.g., enamel chipping, notches, occlusal or interproximal grooves, notches, erosion, lingual surface attrition of the maxillary anterior teeth [LSAMAT] and instrumental striations on labial/buccal surfaces)—provides data of biocultural relevance for the reconstruction and understanding of dietary variation, nondietary manipulative behaviours, trauma, pathological conditions, cultural modification of the dentition for social expression of identities, occupation and other indicators of past human lifeways (Alt & Pichler, 1998; d'Incau, Couture, & Maureille, 2012; Krueger, 2015; Krueger, Willman, Matthews, Hublin, & Pérez‐Pérez, 2019; Milner & Larsen, 1991; Molnar, 1972; Schmidt, El Zaatari, & Van Sessen, 2020; Schmidt, Remy, Van Sessen, & Herrmann, 2019). The analysis of specific, idiosyncratic or aberrant dental wear features is particularly illustrative for reconstructions of behaviour and identity (Alt & Pichler, 1998; Crane, Watson, & Haas, 2020; Milner & Larsen, 1991; Molnar, 1972; Stojanowski, Johnson, Paul, & Carver, 2016; Willman, Hernando, Matu, & Crevecoeur, 2020a), since these wear patterns can be coupled with inferences gained from ethnographically, ethnohistorically and clinically documented patterns of atypical tooth‐using tasks and the sociocultural contexts they involve (Barrett, 1977; Berbesque et al, 2012; Crowfoot, 1931; Daly, Bakar, Husein, Ismail, & Amaechi, 2010; Erdal, 2008; Fidalgo, Silva, & Porfírio, 2020; Gould, 1968; Krueger, 2015; Merbs, 1983; Scott & Jolie, 2008; Vogeikoff‐Brogan & Smith, 2010; Wheat, 1967).…”