2017
DOI: 10.1111/mve.12282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of acaricide treatment of sheep on red grouseLagopus lagopus scoticatick burdens and productivity in a multi‐host system

Abstract: Ixodes ricinus (Ixodida: Ixodidae) ticks are of economic and pathogenic importance across Europe. Within the uplands of the U.K., management to reduce ticks is undertaken to benefit red grouse Lagopus lagopus scotica (Galliformes: Phasianidae). Management strategies focus on the acaricide treatment of domestic sheep Ovis aries (Artiodactyla: Bovidae), but the effectiveness of this is less certain in the presence of wild hosts, particularly red deer Cervus elaphus (Artiodactyla: Cervidae) and mountain hare Lepu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If culling of hares in an attempt to reduce LIV in grouse has driven the severe declines seen since 1999, as seems a parsimonious explanation, then it is important also to recognise that there is no evidence that the culls increase either red grouse densities (Harrison et al., ) or chick survival (Fletcher, ). Indeed, in a recent study of the effect of acaricidal treatment of sheep on red grouse tick burden and breeding productivity, Fletcher and Baines () noted that grouse productivity and local mountain hare abundance were positively rather than inversely correlated. Elsewhere, culling as a means of disease reduction or improvement of economic returns also has a poor track record of success across taxa as diverse as Yellowstone bison Bison bison , European badger Meles meles , and Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii as well as mountain hare (e.g., Beeton & McCallum, ; Harrison et al., ; Vial & Donnelly, ; White, Wallen, Geremia, Treanor, & Blanton, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If culling of hares in an attempt to reduce LIV in grouse has driven the severe declines seen since 1999, as seems a parsimonious explanation, then it is important also to recognise that there is no evidence that the culls increase either red grouse densities (Harrison et al., ) or chick survival (Fletcher, ). Indeed, in a recent study of the effect of acaricidal treatment of sheep on red grouse tick burden and breeding productivity, Fletcher and Baines () noted that grouse productivity and local mountain hare abundance were positively rather than inversely correlated. Elsewhere, culling as a means of disease reduction or improvement of economic returns also has a poor track record of success across taxa as diverse as Yellowstone bison Bison bison , European badger Meles meles , and Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii as well as mountain hare (e.g., Beeton & McCallum, ; Harrison et al., ; Vial & Donnelly, ; White, Wallen, Geremia, Treanor, & Blanton, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of tick infestation rates on sheep and red grouse chicks from this study with other studies in the U.K. in relation to whether acaricide treatment of sheep was 'standard' (typically two applications per year) or had been 'improved' (four applications per year). (Fletcher & Baines, 2018) 2012-13 Improved -(24) 5.8 (0.3-23.2) North York Moors (Newborn & Baines, 2012) 1992-99 Standard -(9) 11.2 (6.4-19.9) 1995-03 Improved -(11) 1.8 (0.1-6.7) North York Moors (Newborn et al, 2014) 2012-13 Standard (2) 5.2 (3.5-6.9) -Improved…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…England (Newborn & Baines, 2012;Newborn et al, 2014, Baines & Taylor, 2016Fletcher & Baines, 2018). In the latter regions, improved acaricide management of hill sheep flocks was associated with a significant reduction in tick burdens of both grouse chicks (Newborn & Baines, 2012) and sheep (Newborn et al, 2014), which in turn was associated with higher grouse chick survival, productivity and post-breeding densities (Baines & Taylor, 2016; D. Baines, Unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, not only migratory birds are important tick hosts, as resident species may serve as high-density hosts [ 15 ], especially in the case of bird species feeding or breeding on the ground [ 16 ]. Papers reporting tick parasitism of resident populations are usually targeting one or a few host species, with game birds [ 17 ] and seabirds [ 18 ] being the most common groups studied, but the ecology of bird-specialist ticks is also well documented in passerines [ 19 , 20 ]. Owls (Strigiformes) are rarely studied as tick hosts, due to their scarcity, nocturnal habits or hard-to-access nesting sites [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%