DOI: 10.22215/etd/2001-04856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of affirmative action on rationalizing sexual harassment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, their physical and emotional health may be impacted negatively, including feelings of anxiety, depression, hopelessness and lowered self esteem (Pavalko, M ossakowski & Hamilton, 2003;Schmitt et al, 2003). For all these reasons, sex-based selection procedures have been adopted by affirm ative action policies resulting in im proved conditions that reinforce and maintain gender equality and accomplishing a decrease in frequency of sex-discrim ination violations in the North American workplace (Crosby, 1994;Giglio, 2001;Pious, 1996).…”
Section: The Preferential Treatment Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, their physical and emotional health may be impacted negatively, including feelings of anxiety, depression, hopelessness and lowered self esteem (Pavalko, M ossakowski & Hamilton, 2003;Schmitt et al, 2003). For all these reasons, sex-based selection procedures have been adopted by affirm ative action policies resulting in im proved conditions that reinforce and maintain gender equality and accomplishing a decrease in frequency of sex-discrim ination violations in the North American workplace (Crosby, 1994;Giglio, 2001;Pious, 1996).…”
Section: The Preferential Treatment Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%