1981
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(81)90101-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of age, positive affect induction, and instructions on children's delay of gratification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strongly supports previous findings: With increasing age, children are better able to delay gratification by distracting themselves from rewards (H. N. Mischel & Mischel, 1983;Yates, 1987;Yates, Lippett, & Yates, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This strongly supports previous findings: With increasing age, children are better able to delay gratification by distracting themselves from rewards (H. N. Mischel & Mischel, 1983;Yates, 1987;Yates, Lippett, & Yates, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Preschoolers left alone with the first marshmallow to wait for the second developed elaborate self-distraction techniques, such as talking or singing to themselves or inventing games with their hands and feet. Active motor behavior has been related to longer waiting times in 5-and 6-year-olds (Yates, Lippett, & Yates, 1981), and cognitive distraction has proven to be even more effective. Preschoolers instructed to think "fun things" achieved longer delay times than their peers who had toys to play with for behavioral distraction (Mischel, Ebbesen, & Raskopf Zeiss, 1972).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children's behavior during the delay period was analyzed using Interact â software (Mangold International, Arnstorf, Germany). Observational codes were developed based on previous studies (e.g., Mischel & Ebbesen, 1970;Rodriguez et al, 1989;Yates et al, 1981). The codes and their definitions are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cognitive and attentional processes affecting the maintenance of voluntary delay behavior in young children also have been extensively investigated [e.g., Mischel, 1974Mischel, , 1981Miller and Karniol, 1976a, b;Toner, 1981;Toner and Smith, 1977;Yates et al, 1981 ]. We know that delay is easier when the rewards are not in view: Preschool children were found to endure self-imposed delay of gratification ten times longer when the re wards for which they waited were obscured rather than exposed during the delay period [Mischel and Ebbesen, 1970].…”
Section: Delay Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%