1971
DOI: 10.3758/bf03331797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of alcohol concentration on schedule-induced alcohol drinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data also indicate that DRL schedule-induced alcohol drinking is strikingly similar to that produced by other procedures. For example, the inverse relationship between alcohol solution concentrations and volume consumed that was found in the present study has been previously demonstrated with an FI90-sec schedule (Holman & Myers, 1968), a VF 60-sec schedule (Everett & King, 1970), and an FF 60-sec schedule (Schrot, Hawkins, & Githens, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The data also indicate that DRL schedule-induced alcohol drinking is strikingly similar to that produced by other procedures. For example, the inverse relationship between alcohol solution concentrations and volume consumed that was found in the present study has been previously demonstrated with an FI90-sec schedule (Holman & Myers, 1968), a VF 60-sec schedule (Everett & King, 1970), and an FF 60-sec schedule (Schrot, Hawkins, & Githens, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In the present study , intake determinations at 7.5% and 10% alcohol showed that a considerable reduction in alcohol drinking occurred within the second half of each session. Freed et al (1970) and Schrot et al (1971) have described similar changes with different spaced pellet procedures. However, these investigators relied on cumulative lick records to document the changes in drinking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…and the manipulation of ethanol concentration in the experimental cages (Everett & King. 1970; Schrot. Hawkins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%