The effects of alloy surface treatments and resins on the retention of resin-bonded retainers

El-Sherif, M.H.; El-Messery, A.; Halhoul, M.N.

doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80012-5

Cited by 16 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Traditionally, base metal alloys in solid frameworks with surface treatments that run the gamut from etching to sandblasting or airborne particle abrasion have been used for RBFPDs 6–9. Contradictory results have been reported when resin cement is bonded to base metal alloys exposed to these different surface treatments 6–9…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of 3 alloy surface treatments for resin‐bonded prostheses

Petrie

Eick

Williams

et al. 2001

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of 3 alloy surface treatments for resin‐bonded prostheses

Petrie

Eick

Williams

et al. 2001

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tanaka et al (20), reported that the bond strength between composite resins and alloys was clearly improved by applying only sandblasting. El-Sherif et al (21), reported that retainer surfaces prepared by air abrading with 250 μm aluminum oxide were superior in retention to those made by the electrochemical etching techniques.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Adhesive and Mechanical Effects on the Bond Strength of Indirect Composite to Titanium

Cengiz¹,

Külünk²,

Velioğlu³

et al. 2016

J Int Dent Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to compare the bonding properties of new dental adhesive systems to the surface of titanium for the express purpose of evaluating these systems for composite veneering of titanium restorations.Fifty-four titanium specimens (10 x 10 x 2 mm) were divided into six groups accourding to the surface conditioning method to be applied. One of the groups served as control and experimental groups consisted of air abrasion with aluminum oxide particles; application of dental adhesive andmetal primer. Surface treatments increased the shear bond strength of indirect composite resin to titanium alloy surface (P<0.05). The highest bond strength values were obtained with application of air abrasion and dental adhesive (26.84±2.25) and significant differences were found between other groups (P<.05). The current study revealed that air abrasion followed by applying dental adhesive with specific functional monomers improves the bond strength of indirect composite to titanium. Key words: Titanium, Indirect composite, Surface treatment, Shear bond strength ÖzBu çalışmanın amacı titanyum restorasyonların hızlıca veneerlenmesi için kompozitlerin kullanılabilmesi açısından yeni dental adeziv sistemlerin titanyum yüzeyine bağlanma özelliklerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Elli dört titanyum örnek (10 x 10 x 2 mm) yüzey hazırlama metodlarına göre altı gruba ayrıldı. Bir grup kontrol grubu olarak kullanılırken, deney grupları aluminyum oksit ile kumlama ardından, adeziv ve metal primerinin uygulanmasıyla hazırlanmıştır. Yüzey uygulamaları titanyum ve indirekt kompozit yüzeyleri arasındaki makaslama dayanımını artırmıştır(p<0.05). En yüksek bağlanma dayanımı kumlama ve dental adezivin uygulamasında (26.84±2.25) bulunmakla birlikte, diğer gruplar arasında da belirgin farklılıklar bulunmuştur. (p<.05). Bu çalışma kumlama sonrasında spesifik fonksiyonel monomer içeren dental adeziv uygulamasının indirekt kompozit ve titanyum arasındaki bağlanma dayanımını artırdığını gös-termiştir.

show abstract

“…May et al27 reported that the polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) established a greater shear bond strength to CP Ti pretreated with air abrasive than the untreated one by more than 3.7 times. El-Sherif et al7 reported that retainer surfaces prepared by air abrading with 250 µm aluminum oxide were superior in retention to those made by the electrochemical etching techniques. In this study, only treatment of sandblasting offered enough bonding strength.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shear bond strength of composite resin to titanium according to various surface treatments

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

STATEMENT OF PROBLEMWhen veneering composite resin-metal restoration is prepared, the fact that bond strength between Ti and composite resin is relatively weak should be considered.PURPOSEThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the shear bond strength between the veneering composite resin and commercial pure (CP) Ti / Ti-6Al-4V alloy according to the method of surface treatment.MATERIAL AND METHODSThe disks were cast by two types of metal. Their surfaces were treated by sandblasting, metal conditioner, TiN coating and silicoating respectively. After surface treatment, the disks were veneered by composite resin (Tescera™, Bisco, USA) which is 5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in thickness. The specimens were stored in water at 25℃ for 24 hours, and then evaluated for their shear bond strength by universal testing machine (STM-5®, United Calibration, USA). These values were statistically analyzed.RESULTS1. All methods of surface treatment were used in this study satisfied the requirements of ISO 10477 which is the standard of polymer-based crown and bridge materials. 2. The metal conditioner treated group showed the highest value in shear bond strength of CP Ti, silicoated group, TiN coated group, sandblasted group, in following order. 3. The silicoated group showed the highest value in shear bond strength of Ti-6Al-4V alloy, metal conditioner treated group, sandblasted group, TiN coated group, in following order.CONCLUSIONWithin the limitations of this study, all methods of surface treatment used in this study are clinically available.

show abstract

The effects of alloy surface treatments and resins on the retention of resin-bonded retainers

Cited by 16 publications

References 9 publications

A comparison of 3 alloy surface treatments for resin‐bonded prostheses

A comparison of 3 alloy surface treatments for resin‐bonded prostheses

Comparison of Adhesive and Mechanical Effects on the Bond Strength of Indirect Composite to Titanium

Shear bond strength of composite resin to titanium according to various surface treatments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About