2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of alternative weaning methods on behaviour in beef calves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
91
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
91
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…nose flaps, and the second after permanent separation (Enríquez et al, 2010;Hötzel et al, 2012). This, however, does not seem to be the case in cows, in which the only response observed after fitting the nose flaps was a small, short-lived increase in vocalizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…nose flaps, and the second after permanent separation (Enríquez et al, 2010;Hötzel et al, 2012). This, however, does not seem to be the case in cows, in which the only response observed after fitting the nose flaps was a small, short-lived increase in vocalizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Treatment groups and experimental periods On day 0 of the experiment, the calves assigned to the nose flap treatment (NF group, 12 cow-calf pairs) were fitted with anti-sucking nose-flap devices made of flexible plastic, measuring 12.5 × 12.5 cm (El Destete, Buenos Aires, Argentina; see picture in Enríquez et al, 2010). Nose-flaps prevent the calves from accessing the teats but allow them to graze, consume ration, drink water and allow the calves to remain near their dams (Hötzel et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations