2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of amorphous carbon films deposited on polyethylene terephthalate on bacterial adhesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
97
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
97
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be related to the interplay of adhesion, hydrophobicity, surface growth, electrostatic forces, and application of friction of the infecting organisms, as reported in the literature [5,9,23]. The adhesion of coagulase negative staphylococcus and E. coli is faster on positively charged copolymers than on negatively charged copolymers because of the negative charge on bacteria [24]. However, the growth of Gram-negative bacteria decreased on positively charged surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be related to the interplay of adhesion, hydrophobicity, surface growth, electrostatic forces, and application of friction of the infecting organisms, as reported in the literature [5,9,23]. The adhesion of coagulase negative staphylococcus and E. coli is faster on positively charged copolymers than on negatively charged copolymers because of the negative charge on bacteria [24]. However, the growth of Gram-negative bacteria decreased on positively charged surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Biofilm formation is related to the adhesion and growth of microorganisms. This is why adhesion differs in vitro and in vivo [24]. Gram-positive bacteria have a comparatively thicker and more rigid peptidoglycan layer, which reduces the effective electrostatic force on Gram-positive bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma immersion ion implantation has been applied to surface treat poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) [153] to successfully improve the antibacterial properties with specific regard to Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli. This has been further evidenced with Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermis on plasma-treated poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) [150,155], E. coli on plasma-treated polyurethane (PU) [152] and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on plasma-treated) PVC [151]. All of which showed a reduction in the adhesion of bacteria to the respective surfaces.…”
Section: Figure 7: Sem Images Of (A) As-received and (B) Plasma Surfamentioning
confidence: 85%
“…From research such as this, it is possible to foresee that plasma-based technologies could potentially be used for polymeric biomaterials in order to improve upon their bioactivity for use in biological environments. Plasma surface treatments have also been extensively used in the production of surfaces to control and investigate bacterial adhesion on numerous material types [148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155]. Plasma immersion ion implantation has been applied to surface treat poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) [153] to successfully improve the antibacterial properties with specific regard to Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli.…”
Section: Figure 7: Sem Images Of (A) As-received and (B) Plasma Surfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely used, for instance, in the production of synthetic fibres, containers of beverage, food and various liquids, machine parts in the mechanical industry, components for precision engineering and medical implant devices, etc. Plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII or PI 3 , called also plasma-based ion implantation) and its deposition variant have been applied to improve the surface barrier, [1 -3] hydrophobic, [4] electrical [5] and bacterial repellence [6,7] properties of PET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%