1971
DOI: 10.1080/00224497109550701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of an interview on attitudes and behavior∗

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…that participation in the weekly assessments does not bias either the sexual activity of the individual or the individual's ability to recall sexual activity on a long-term basis. Evidence for the absence of such testing effects on risk behavior has been provided in several studies, both in the sexual domain (Fujita, 1971;Kunin & Ames, 1981;Rubin & Mitchell, 1976) and in other areas of study (Gersovitz, Madden, & Smickilas-Wright, 1978;Smith, Jobe, & Mingay, 1991). For example, Halpern, Udry and Suchindran (1991) found no evidence for monitoring effects when comparing adolescents who were monitored on a weekly basis for two years with non-monitored controls.…”
Section: Paradigm Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that participation in the weekly assessments does not bias either the sexual activity of the individual or the individual's ability to recall sexual activity on a long-term basis. Evidence for the absence of such testing effects on risk behavior has been provided in several studies, both in the sexual domain (Fujita, 1971;Kunin & Ames, 1981;Rubin & Mitchell, 1976) and in other areas of study (Gersovitz, Madden, & Smickilas-Wright, 1978;Smith, Jobe, & Mingay, 1991). For example, Halpern, Udry and Suchindran (1991) found no evidence for monitoring effects when comparing adolescents who were monitored on a weekly basis for two years with non-monitored controls.…”
Section: Paradigm Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found no consistent evidence for monitoring effects when comparing adolescents who were monitored on a weekly basis over a 2-year period with nonmonitored controls. Other studies on testing effects (not involving weekly assessments) have tended to find only minor, if any, influences of testing on sexual behavior (e.g., Fujita, Wagner, & Pion, 1971;Kunin & Ames, 1981;Rubin & Mitchell, 1976).…”
Section: Monitoring Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two rationales most often encountered in support of this longstanding prohibition are: that direct interviews with children about sexual matters, generally, may adversely affect the development of their subsequent sexual attitudes and behavior, and that such discussions, especially if they raise the question of the child's possible involvement in such things as incest and rape, will create anxiety, psychological pain, or other emotional distress. The first caution has been largely dispelled by Fujita, Wagner, Perthow, and Pion (1971) who found that the sexual attitudes and behavior of young college students who had been interviewed about their sexual activities had not changed appreciably several months after the interviews. The latter concern, however, persists despite the fact that it remains empirically unsubstantiated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%