2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of aquaculture production noise on the growth, condition factor, feed conversion, and survival of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of spawning increased over weekends when there were less human activity in the laboratory during the present study. According to Davidson et al (2009), routine activities in the laboratories promote excessive noise, inducing a number of negative responses leading to temporary stress in animals (Smith et al, 2004;Wysocki et al, 2006). The reduced human activity during the weekends, therefore, most likely contributed to an enviroment that favored the increased incidence of spawning on weekends that was noted in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The incidence of spawning increased over weekends when there were less human activity in the laboratory during the present study. According to Davidson et al (2009), routine activities in the laboratories promote excessive noise, inducing a number of negative responses leading to temporary stress in animals (Smith et al, 2004;Wysocki et al, 2006). The reduced human activity during the weekends, therefore, most likely contributed to an enviroment that favored the increased incidence of spawning on weekends that was noted in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Furthermore, although it is still unknown how fish actually perceive this kind Table 2 Liver and carcass composition, blood variables, and brain neurotransmitters of common carp reared under two light intensities (LI: 80 and 200 lux) and exposed to no Table 3 Total protease activity and capacity of anterior and posterior intestine of common carp reared under two light intensities (LI: 80 and 200 lux) and exposed to no music of sound stimulus, all three music experiments report positive effects on fish performance, whereas when other sound stimuli were used (i.e. noise, humangenerated sound) negative effects or no effects were observed (Davidson et al 2009;Graham and Cooke 2008;Popper 2003;Wysocki et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The lack of an effect on growth after a few weeks of exposure is in line with most previous work exploring the impacts of anthropogenic noise on fish (Wysocki et al ., ; Bruintjes & Radford, ; Nedelec et al ., , in press; but see Anderson et al ., ). If growth had been affected earlier on (see Davidson et al ., ; Nedelec et al ., ), catch‐up growth can be detrimental to fitness due to oxidative stress (Lee et al ., ), but there appeared to be no treatment‐based effects on growth at any stage in the experimental exposure period. However, there could have been other effects that we did not measure, such as on telomere length (see Meillère et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%