2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7753(99)00341-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of battlefield contaminants on PEMFC performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
129
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
129
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the results reported by Moore et al, 20 the maximum cell performance decay with 0.5 ppm SO 2 (0.05 A/cm 2 and 0.5 h duration) was found to be on the trend line for this study (indicated by ). In contrast, the values for maximum cell performance decay ratio reported by Mohtadi et al 21 ( and ), Jing et al 22 ( ), and Nagahara et al…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the results reported by Moore et al, 20 the maximum cell performance decay with 0.5 ppm SO 2 (0.05 A/cm 2 and 0.5 h duration) was found to be on the trend line for this study (indicated by ). In contrast, the values for maximum cell performance decay ratio reported by Mohtadi et al 21 ( and ), Jing et al 22 ( ), and Nagahara et al…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…It has been reported that the emissions from ICEs contain 4 ppm of SO CO. 20 For example, Moore et al 20 analyzed the impurity effect of SO 2 , NO 2 , and CO at fixed concentrations of 500 ppb, 400 ppb, and 20 ppm, respectively. Van Zee's group 21 reported more severe degradation with higher concentration of SO 2 (5 ppm) and NO 2 (5 ppm) in air.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, open-cathode PEFCs have to survive under a range of atmospheric compositions which can include sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and ionic contamination, as well as fuel impurities that can all potentially cause irreversible damage to the PEFC [1]. The list of critical contaminants is much longer if we also consider the effects of battlefield gases for military applications [2]. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a powerful technique that can be applied in-situ for diagnosis of the PEFC performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to contamination impact observation, the effects on fuel cell performance of impurities such as CO, CO 2 ,H 2 S, and NH 3 in the fuel feed [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and SO x ,N O x ,H 2 S, and NH 3 [16,[21][22][23][24] in the air stream have been extensively examined. A study of battlefield air impurities such as benzene, propane, HCN, CNCL, sarin, and sulfur mustard has also been reported [25]. In terms of model development for predicting fuel cell contamination, numerous studies on fuel cell contamination have been conducted, especially for CO contamination [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%