2020
DOI: 10.1002/pits.22375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of behavior‐specific praise and public posting in secondary classrooms

Abstract: Behavior‐specific praise (BSP) and other forms of positive feedback and public acknowledgment are underutilized in secondary classrooms. Surprisingly, few studies have evaluated the independent effects of BSP in these settings. Using a multiple baseline design with an embedded A/B/B + C condition sequence, the purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effects of BSP and BSP combined with public posting on the appropriately engaged and disruptive behaviors across 4 secondary classrooms. Results supported… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prompting procedure utilized in the current study resulted in observed praise rates that are similar to those of Markelz et al (2019), who used an automated tactile prompt via Apple Watch to cue delivery and self‐monitoring of BSP. The results of the current study suggest that the prompting procedure evaluated in the current study, which relied on widely available resources, may result in notable increases in BSP use in classrooms while avoiding the requirement for less commonly available resources (e.g., MotivAider; O'Handley et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The prompting procedure utilized in the current study resulted in observed praise rates that are similar to those of Markelz et al (2019), who used an automated tactile prompt via Apple Watch to cue delivery and self‐monitoring of BSP. The results of the current study suggest that the prompting procedure evaluated in the current study, which relied on widely available resources, may result in notable increases in BSP use in classrooms while avoiding the requirement for less commonly available resources (e.g., MotivAider; O'Handley et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Across studies, teachers viewed BSP as socially valid (e.g., acceptable, effective, and quickly effective). In addition, although teacher reprimands were not measured in Blaze et al’s (2014) study, teachers in O’Handley et al’s (2020) and Haydon and Musti-Rao’s (2011) study naturally used fewer reprimands as BSP increased. The natural reduction of reprimands is noteworthy because reprimands are often disproportionately distributed to ethnic minority students (Scott et al, 2019).…”
Section: Bsp In Secondary Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Blaze, Olmi, Mercer, Dufrene, and Tingstrom (2014) compared public and private BSP in four secondary classrooms, finding both types of BSP to equally improve classwide appropriately engaged behavior (AEB) and reduce DB. Similarly, O’Handley, Olmi, Dufrene, Tingstrom, and Whipple (2020) tested the effects of BSP alone and combined it with a public posting feature in four secondary classrooms. Teachers wrote students’ names on the classroom whiteboard after praising their behavior, providing an additional source of public acknowledgment.…”
Section: Bsp In Secondary Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations