2002
DOI: 10.1177/0011128702048003006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Behavioral/Cognitive-Behavioral Programs on Recidivism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
105
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
105
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Four separate meta-analytic studies supported the efficacy of CBT for criminal offenders (Illescas, Sanchez-Meca, & Genovés, 2001; Lösel & Schmucker, 2005; Pearson, Lipton, Cleland, & Yee, 2002; Wilson, Bouffard, Mackenzie, 2005). Out of several theoretical orientations and types of psychological interventions for criminal activity, behavior therapy and CBT appeared to be the superior interventions in reducing recidivism rates, both with medium mean effect sizes (Illescas, Sanchez-Meca, & Genovés, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Four separate meta-analytic studies supported the efficacy of CBT for criminal offenders (Illescas, Sanchez-Meca, & Genovés, 2001; Lösel & Schmucker, 2005; Pearson, Lipton, Cleland, & Yee, 2002; Wilson, Bouffard, Mackenzie, 2005). Out of several theoretical orientations and types of psychological interventions for criminal activity, behavior therapy and CBT appeared to be the superior interventions in reducing recidivism rates, both with medium mean effect sizes (Illescas, Sanchez-Meca, & Genovés, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…25 Evidence-based practices for reducing recidivism in the adult general population include substance abuse treatment, 26 education 27 or employment 28,29 programs, and the general array of cognitive behavioral approaches for reducing offending behavior. 30,31 All have moderate effects on recidivism, but the efficacy of these approaches specifically with emerging adults is either unknown or less potent. 32 Only two programs with a focus on emerging adults have some evidence of recidivism reduction efficacy in the general population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Akers and Sellers (2009) have reported that while large effect sizes are generally rare in evaluations of any specific policy or program targeting delinquency, a considerable amount of research has demonstrated that prevention and treatment programs focusing on juveniles and adults based on social learning principles often have significant and measureable effects on reducing crime and delinquency. Furthermore, these effects are often greater than those observed in programs that follow alternative theoretical principles (see Botvin et al 1995; Ellis and Sowers 2001; Pearson et al 2002; Andrews and Bonta 2003; Cullen et al 2003; Triplett and Payne 2004; Landenberger and Lipsey 2005; Gendreau and Smith 2006). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%