2019
DOI: 10.1002/aic.16670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of bimetallic interactions for CO2‐assisted oxidative dehydrogenation and dry reforming of propane

Abstract: The catalytic reduction of CO 2 by propane may occur via dry reforming to produce syngas (CO + H 2 ) or oxidative dehydrogenation to yield propylene. Utilizing propane and CO 2 as coreactants presents several advantages over conventional methane dry reforming or direct propane dehydrogenation, including lower operating temperatures and less coke formation. Thus, it is of great interest to identify catalytic systems that can either effectively break the C C bond to generate syngas or selectively break C H bonds… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address these issues, other soft oxidants, such as nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide, have been considered as co‐feeds in propane dehydrogenation reaction. [ 5,6 ] The utilization of CO 2 as a soft oxidant does not form an explosive reactive mixture (unlike oxygen), prevents over oxidation of propylene and propane, and alters the pathway by providing an oxygen atom that combines with the hydrogen atoms from the propane CH bond scission to give water. This makes the reaction feasible at a lower operating temperature, due to its favorable thermodynamics compared to direct dehydrogenation of propane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these issues, other soft oxidants, such as nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide, have been considered as co‐feeds in propane dehydrogenation reaction. [ 5,6 ] The utilization of CO 2 as a soft oxidant does not form an explosive reactive mixture (unlike oxygen), prevents over oxidation of propylene and propane, and alters the pathway by providing an oxygen atom that combines with the hydrogen atoms from the propane CH bond scission to give water. This makes the reaction feasible at a lower operating temperature, due to its favorable thermodynamics compared to direct dehydrogenation of propane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Butane, which is a side product of crude oil cracking and is widely available from shale gas, [9] is thermodynamically less stable (Δ G 0 (n-normalC4normalH10) =−16.6 kJ ⋅ mol −1 ) than smaller hydrocarbons such as methane (Δ G 0 (CH4) =−50.5 kJ ⋅ mol −1 ). Therefore, dry reforming of butane (DRB) allows us to bring down the reaction temperature to 500–600 °C [10–13] . The problem is that dry reforming catalysts usually suffer from deactivation through sintering of active sites and coking [14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZrO 2 is debatably considered to be reducible or at least partially reducible, but it is certain that the support exhibits surface defects or kinks that can strongly influence catalyst activity and selectivity [29]. CeO 2 is classified as a readily reducible oxide with ability to store and release oxygen, which not only facilitates CO 2 activation, but also provides lattice oxygen for coke suppression [30]. There is a clear need to expand the knowledge regarding the effect of oxide supports for the reaction of C 2 H 6 with CO 2 to develop highly active and selective catalysts for the This article is protected by copyright.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%