2020
DOI: 10.5194/wes-5-503-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of blade structural model fidelity on wind turbine load analysis and computation time

Abstract: Abstract. Aero-servo-elastic analyses are required to determine the wind turbine loading for a wide range of load cases as specified in certification standards. The floating reference frame (FRF) formulation can be used to model the structural response of long and flexible wind turbine blades. Increasing the number of bodies in the FRF formulation of the blade increases both the fidelity of the structural model and the size of the problem. However, the turbine load analysis is a coupled aero-servo-elastic anal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MIRAS‐LL simulations employ a bound vortex discretized with 40 straight segments following a cosinus distribution, where the root and the tip region have a higher point density. The influence of the HAWC2 structural model fidelity of the blade on the response, loads, and stability of large turbines has been analyzed in Gözcü and Verelst 46 . A 28R × 4R × 4R Cartesian mesh has been employed in all cases, with a constant spacing of 3 m in the x , y , and z directions which adds up to a total of approximately 29 million cells.…”
Section: Choice Of Simulation Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MIRAS‐LL simulations employ a bound vortex discretized with 40 straight segments following a cosinus distribution, where the root and the tip region have a higher point density. The influence of the HAWC2 structural model fidelity of the blade on the response, loads, and stability of large turbines has been analyzed in Gözcü and Verelst 46 . A 28R × 4R × 4R Cartesian mesh has been employed in all cases, with a constant spacing of 3 m in the x , y , and z directions which adds up to a total of approximately 29 million cells.…”
Section: Choice Of Simulation Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the HAWC2 structural model fidelity of the blade on the response, loads, and stability of large turbines has been analyzed in Gözcü and Verelst. 46 A 28R Â 4R Â 4R Cartesian mesh has been employed in all cases, with a constant spacing of 3 m in the x, y, and z directions which adds up to a total of approximately 29 million cells. This cell size has been chosen to be equal to the one used to resolve the wake behind the complex multi-rotor turbine in van der Laan.…”
Section: Computational Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MIRAS‐LL simulations employ a bound vortex discretized with 40 straight segments following a cosine distribution, where the root and the tip region have a higher point density. The influence of the HAWC2 structural model fidelity of the blade on the response, loads, and stability of large turbines has been analyzed in Gözcü and Verelst 41 . The turbine hub is located at a position of 1.125R from the water level, and its wake effect has not been included in the present modeling approach.…”
Section: Numerical Models and Computational Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the HAWC2 structural model fidelity of the blade on the response, loads, and stability of large turbines has been analyzed in Gözcü and Verelst. 41 The turbine hub is located at a position of 1.125R from the water level, and its wake effect has not been included in the present modeling approach. An eight-order stencil is used to spatially discretize the vorticity equation.…”
Section: Computational Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blades are constrained around the hub node with revolute constraints, allowing for rotations around the pitch axis. HAWC2 makes use of a multi-body floating reference framework with Timoshenko beam elements instead, allowing for the capability to account for structural shear forces [32]. The turbine is modeled with nine bodies, one for each blade and corresponding hub, one for the tower and tower top and ultimately one for the shaft.…”
Section: Aeroelastic Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%