2023
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.8069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of blueberry and cranberry supplementation on blood pressure in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials

Felipe Mendes Delpino,
Francine Silva dos Santos,
Thaynã Ramos Flores
et al.

Abstract: Blueberries and cranberries are berry fruits with the highest number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) focusing on blood pressure (BP). This systematic review and meta‐analysis of RCTs analyzed the effects of blueberry and cranberry supplementation alone and in concert with systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) in patients with cardiometabolic diseases. The searches were performed until August 2023 in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase. Studies that examined the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 81 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, supplementation with these fruits showed no significant effect on blood pressure in another study examining the impact of blueberries or cranberries on blood pressure ( Delpino et al, 2023 ), which is partially consistent with our research findings. We also found a non-significant result in systolic blood pressure, but the diastolic blood pressure was significantly decreased.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, supplementation with these fruits showed no significant effect on blood pressure in another study examining the impact of blueberries or cranberries on blood pressure ( Delpino et al, 2023 ), which is partially consistent with our research findings. We also found a non-significant result in systolic blood pressure, but the diastolic blood pressure was significantly decreased.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%